Stroke Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Devices and Environmental Modifications Following Primary Rehabilitation in Hospital—A Therapeutic Perspective

The aim of this article is to describe the need for assistive devices and environmental modifications among long-living stroke survivors and to investigate if the need is continued and growing over time. The study sample of 155 consecutive stroke patients with stroke-related impairment, discharged home from three hospitals in Copenhagen from 1996 through 1998, constituted 20% of the total population of stroke survivors in this area. The results showed that 75% of these patients were provided with assistive devices and/or environmental modifications at discharge. Six months after discharge the proportion was 81%. The aids most frequently prescribed were bath seats, aids for mobility, grab bars, and removal of door thresholds. At follow-up 3–5 years later, 74% of the survivors were seen (76 patients). Almost all of the survivors were dependent on assistive devices and/or environmental modifications, most frequently wheelchairs and aids for walking and bathing. In addition there was a significant increase in aids for cooking/eating and reading/hearing/writing adaptations. Of those devices abandoned, most were aids for the household. These findings suggest that home visits by therapists should be required in order to target stroke survivors' changing needs for assistive devices and environmental modifications.

[1]  Lisbeth Claesson,et al.  Assistive Devices in Elderly People After Stroke: A Longitudinal, Randomized Study - The Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study , 2002 .

[2]  G. Boysen,et al.  Reliability of Scandinavian Neurological Stroke Scale , 1991 .

[3]  S. Kreiner,et al.  Construct validation and the Rasch model , 1993, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[4]  J. Persson,et al.  Assistive technologies in stroke rehabilitation from a user perspective. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[5]  B. Westling,et al.  Rehabilitation and achieved health quality after stroke. A population‐based study of 258 hospitalized cases followed for one year , 1990, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[6]  S. Kreiner,et al.  Functional ability of community dwelling elderly. Criterion-related validity of a new measure of functional ability. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  B. H. Forchhammer,et al.  Can readmission after stroke be prevented? Results of a randomized clinical study: a postdischarge follow-up service for stroke survivors. , 2000, Stroke.

[8]  Principal Investigators,et al.  The World Health Organization MONICA project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collabaration , 1988 .

[9]  A. Térent Medico-social consequences and direct costs of stroke in a Swedish community. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  I. Aboderin,et al.  Stroke management in Europe , 1996 .

[11]  A. Tennant,et al.  Outcome following stroke. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  L. von Koch,et al.  Functional Outcome, Rehabilitation Use and Length of Hospital Stay for Stroke Patients in South Madrid , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[13]  P. Sandercock,et al.  A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project--1981-86. 2. Incidence, case fatality rates and overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  E M Badley,et al.  Handicap in stroke survivors. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  P A Wolf,et al.  Epidemiologic profile of long-term stroke disability: the Framingham study. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  C. Wolfe,et al.  A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[18]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .