Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis.

The present paper examines the processing of speech by dyslexic readers and compares their performance with that of age-matched (CA) and reading-ability-matched (RA) controls. In Experiment 1, subjects repeated single-syllable stimuli (words and nonwords) presented either in a favorable signal-to-noise ratio or with noise masking. Noise affected all subjects to the same extent. Dyslexic children performed as well as controls when repeating high-frequency words, but they had difficulty relative to CA-controls with low-frequency words and relative to both CA- and RA-controls when repeating nonwords. In Experiments 2 and 3, subjects made auditory lexical decisions about the stimuli presented in Experiment 1. Dyslexics performed less well than CA-controls, gaining similar scores to RA-controls. Thus, their difficulty in repeating low-frequency words could be reinterpreted as a difficulty with nonword repetition. Taken together, these results suggest that dyslexics have difficulty with the nonlexical procedures (including phoneme segmentation) involved in verbal repetition. One consequence is that they take longer to consolidate "new" words; verbal memory and reading processes are also compromised.

[1]  J. Marshall,et al.  A case study of developmental phonological dyslexia. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[2]  M. Snowling Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia , 1981, Psychological research.

[3]  T. R. Miles,et al.  Dyslexia, the pattern of difficulties , 1983 .

[4]  V. Mann,et al.  Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. , 1983, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  H. Swanson Semantic and visual memory codes in learning disabled readers. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  The Development of Phoneme Segmentation Skills in Young Children , 1983 .

[7]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Memory for item order and phonetic recording in the beginning reader. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E. Boder Developmental Dyslexia: a Diagnostic Approach Based on Three Atypical Reading‐spelling Patterns , 1973 .

[10]  E. Warrington,et al.  A two-route model of speech production. Evidence from aphasia. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  J. Mitterer There are at least two kinds of poor readers: whole-word poor readers and recoding poor readers. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[12]  M. Denckla,et al.  Tests that discriminate between dyslexic and other learning-disabled boys , 1981, Brain and Language.

[13]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  Development of phonetic memory in disabled and normal readers. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  J. Lotz Speech and Language , 1950 .

[15]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[16]  P. Bryant,et al.  Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness , 1978, Nature.

[17]  James W. Hall,et al.  Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Speech Processes in Reading. , 1982 .

[19]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[20]  V. Mann Reading skill and language skill , 1984 .

[21]  R. Johnston Phonological coding in dyslexic readers. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[22]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[23]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability , 1984 .

[24]  J. Fletcher Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups: analysis by selective reminding. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.