Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology

Different countries employ a range of assessment methods to monitor trainees from novice to independent practice. The optimal method to monitor and assess individuals' training in endoscopy has not been formally determined. The UK has developed a competency based assessment training and certification (credentialing) programme. The tools developed to provide endoscopy work based assessments (DOPS) have been validated and are used for trainees and independent endoscopists, providing formative feedback for targeted training. Summative assessments are used for trainee certification and independent colonoscopists wishing to provide part of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. The UK was able to develop both clinical standards and an endoscopy training and certification process applied to all individuals and monitored by a single professional body. The supporting IT system enabled a structured and robust quality assurance process to be applied to all individuals and endoscopy units. Assessment of practising endoscopists relies on the development and measurement of surrogate measures, which represent key performance indicators for those individuals. These surrogates for performance are still evolving although they are now well established for colonoscopy practice. Monitoring of independent practice is dependent on clinical audit of these key performance indicators. Feedback of data to individuals helps benchmarking and identification of those with sub-optimal performance. Independent endoscopists now recognize the benefit of on-going

[1]  S. Riley,et al.  Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  D. Macintosh,et al.  Training the gastrointestinal endoscopy trainer. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology.

[3]  J. R. Barton,et al.  The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  C. Williams,et al.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? , 2004, Gut.

[5]  M. Hull,et al.  Screen-detected colorectal cancers are associated with an improved outcome compared with stage-matched interval cancers , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  R. Valori Quality Improvements in Endoscopy in England , 2012 .

[7]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review , 2015, Gut.

[8]  N. Naeem,et al.  Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). , 2013, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[9]  Benjamin K. Poulose,et al.  Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  R. Valori,et al.  Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists , 2010, Frontline Gastroenterology.

[11]  J. Williams,et al.  The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK , 2012, Gut.

[12]  S. Moss,et al.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme , 2011, Gut.

[13]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests , 2010, Gut.

[14]  Brian Jolly,et al.  Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessment , 2002, Medical education.