Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection

In pharmacokinetic data analysis, it is frequently necessary to select the number of exponential terms in a polyexponential expression used to describe the concentration-time relationship. The performance characteristics of several selection criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and the Schwarz Criterion (SC), and theF test (α=0.05), were examined using Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, the ability of these criteria to select the correct model, to select a model allowing estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters with small bias and good precision, and to select a model allowing precise predictions of concentration was evaluated. To some extent interrelationships among these procedures is explainable. Results indicate that theF test tends to choose the simpler model more often than does either the AIC or SC, even when the more complex model is correct. Also, theF test is more sensitive to deficient sampling designs. Clearance estimates are generally very robust to the choice of the wrong model. Other pharmacokinetic parameters are more sensitive to model choice, particularly the apparent elimination rate constant. Prediction of concentrations is generally more precise when the correct model is chosen. The tendency for theF test (α=0.05) to choose the simpler model must be considered relative to the objectives of the study.

[1]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[2]  A. Wright,et al.  Use of the F test for determining the degree of enzyme-kinetic and ligand-binding data. A Monte Carlo simulation study. , 1983, The Biochemical journal.

[3]  William G. Bardsley,et al.  The F test for model discrimination with exponential functions , 1986 .

[4]  John G. Wagner,et al.  Do you need a pharmacokinetic model, and, if so, which one? , 1975, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[5]  Harold G. Boxenbaum,et al.  Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics , 1974, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[6]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[7]  M. Rocchetti,et al.  Efficiency of different criteria for selecting pharmacokinetic multiexponential equations , 1991, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[8]  B. Imbimbo,et al.  A new criterion for selection of pharmacokinetic multiexponential equations. , 1988, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[10]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[11]  A. Atkinson Posterior probabilities for choosing a regression model , 1978 .

[12]  S. Beal Some clarifications regarding moments of residence times with pharmacokinetic models , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[13]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[14]  D. Cutler,et al.  Numerical deconvolution by least squares: Use of prescribed input functions , 1978, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[15]  Kiyoshi Yamaoka,et al.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations , 1978, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.