Interpreting the link value of similarity scores between illicit drug specimens through a dual approach, featuring deterministic and Bayesian frameworks.

Illicit drug trafficking and in particular amphetamine-type stimulants continue to be a major problem in Australia. With the constant evolution of illicit drugs markets, it is necessary to gain as much knowledge about them to disrupt or reduce their impact. Illicit drug specimens can be analysed to generate forensic intelligence and understand criminal activities. Part of this analysis involves the evaluation of similarity scores between illicit drug profiles to interpret the link value. Most studies utilise one of two prominent score evaluation approaches, i.e. deterministic or Bayesian. In previous work, the notion of a dual approach was suggested, which emphasised the complementary nature of the two mentioned approaches. The aim of this study was to assess the operational capability of a dual approach in evaluating similarity scores between illicit drug profiles. Utilising a practical example, link values were generated individually from both approaches, then compared in parallel. As a result, it was possible to generate more informed hypotheses, relating to specimen linkage, due to the greater wealth of information available from the two approaches working concurrently. Additionally, it was shown that applying only one approach led to less information being generated during analysis as well as potentially important links between illicit drug specimens being missed.

[1]  P Hayoz,et al.  Establishment of an operational system for drug profiling: a Swiss experience. , 2005, Bulletin on narcotics.

[2]  Claude Roux,et al.  The use of organic and inorganic impurities found in MDMA police seizures in a drug intelligence perspective. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[3]  O. Ribaux,et al.  Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[4]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems. , 2011, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[5]  J A Lambert,et al.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[6]  S Lociciro,et al.  Cocaine profiling for strategic intelligence, a cross-border project between France and Switzerland: part II. Validation of the statistical methodology for the profiling of cocaine. , 2008, Forensic Science International.

[7]  Palle Villesen,et al.  Cocaine classification using alkaloid and residual solvent profiling. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[8]  Pierre Margot,et al.  The systematic profiling of false identity documents: method validation and performance evaluation using seizures known to originate from common and different sources. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[9]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition , 2000, Speech Commun..

[10]  Julian Broséus,et al.  First systematic chemical profiling of cocaine police seizures in Finland in the framework of an intelligence-led approach. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[11]  Michael Collins,et al.  Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience – revisited , 2017 .

[12]  Pierre Margot,et al.  Forensic Intelligence and Crime Analysis , 2003 .

[13]  P. R. De Forest,et al.  Recapturing the essence of criminalistics. , 1999 .

[14]  Ivo Alberink,et al.  Variation in likelihood ratios for forensic evidence evaluation of XTC tablets comparison , 2011 .

[15]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Different likelihood ratio approaches to evaluate the strength of evidence of MDMA tablet comparisons. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[16]  Nj Tilley,et al.  Forensic science and crime investigation , 1996 .

[17]  I. W. Evett,et al.  Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework , 1998 .

[18]  David Lucy,et al.  Introduction to Statistics for Forensic Scientists , 2005 .

[19]  Claude Roux,et al.  Forensic intelligence framework. Part II: Study of the main generic building blocks and challenges through the examples of illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[20]  Claude Roux,et al.  Forensic intelligence framework--Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[21]  Claude Roux,et al.  The use of methylamphetamine chemical profiling in an intelligence-led perspective and the observation of inhomogeneity within seizures. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[22]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[23]  M Morelato.  Forensic drug profiling : a tool for intelligence-led policing , 2015 .

[24]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Forensic drug intelligence: an important tool in law enforcement. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[25]  James Robertson,et al.  Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience , 2007 .

[26]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[27]  David Barclay,et al.  Using forensic science in major crime inquiries , 2009 .

[28]  Claude Roux,et al.  Review of the most common chemometric techniques in illicit drug profiling. , 2019, Forensic science international.

[29]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Illicit drug profiling, reflection on statistical comparisons. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[30]  Claude Roux,et al.  The use of forensic case data in intelligence-led policing: the example of drug profiling. , 2013, Forensic science international.