Perceptual causality and animacy

[1]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[2]  C. Uller,et al.  Goal attribution in chimpanzees , 2000, Cognition.

[3]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[4]  Alan B. Milne,et al.  Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events , 1999 .

[5]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[6]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Do 9-Month-Olds Perceive Causation-at-a-Distance? , 1999, Perception.

[7]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  Csaba Veres,et al.  The perceived intentionality of groups , 1999, Cognition.

[9]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Modularity, Development and ‘Theory of Mind’ , 1999 .

[10]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[11]  Uta Frith,et al.  How the brain reads the mind , 1999 .

[12]  A Schlottmann,et al.  Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: how children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[13]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[14]  A. Slater.  Perceptual Development: Visual, Auditory, and Speech Perception in Infancy. Studies in Developmental Psychology. , 2000 .

[15]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The human amygdala in social judgment , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  A nonhuman primate's expectations about object motion and destination: The importance of self-propelled movement and animacy , 1998 .

[17]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  J. Cole.  About face , 1998, Nature.

[19]  P. Rochat,et al.  Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .

[20]  P. White,et al.  Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. , 1997, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  David Premack,et al.  Intention as psychological cause , 1996 .

[22]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[23]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: Immunized concepts or nonstatements? , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[25]  Causal knowledge in animals. , 1995 .

[26]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. , 1995 .

[27]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .

[28]  A. Karmiloff-Smith.  Précis of Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[30]  L. Oakes.  Development of Infants' Use of Continuity Cues in Their Perception of Causality. , 1994 .

[31]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[32]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[33]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[34]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[35]  Ken Springer,et al.  Structure, Motion, and Preschoolers' Perceptions of Social Causality , 1993 .

[36]  N. Anderson,et al.  An information integration approach to phenomenal causality , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[37]  L. Cohen,et al.  How infants perceive a simple causal event , 1993 .

[38]  B. Eckardt.  What Is Cognitive Science , 1992 .

[39]  Stephen J. Misovich,et al.  Effects of Disruption of Structure and Motion on Perceptions of Social Causality , 1992 .

[40]  D. Shanks,et al.  Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  D. Premack.  The infant's theory of self-propelled objects , 1990, Cognition.

[42]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception of a causal event , 1990 .

[43]  R. Day,et al.  Perceived Causality Occurs with Stroboscopic Movement of One or Both Stimulus Elements , 1990, Perception.

[44]  R. Gelman.  First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate‐Inanimate Distinction as Examples , 1990 .

[45]  D. Premack,et al.  The perception of intention. , 1989, Science.

[46]  P. White.  Causal Processing: Origins and Development , 1988 .

[47]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Thought Without Language , 1988 .

[48]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Cognitive Science: An Introduction , 1987 .

[49]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[50]  B. Rimé,et al.  The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement , 1985 .

[51]  A. Leslie.  Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants , 1984, Perception.

[52]  A. Leslie.  Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. , 1984 .

[53]  S. Runeson.  On visual perception of dynamic events , 1983 .

[54]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[55]  A. Leslie.  The Perception of Causality in Infants , 1982, Perception.

[56]  S. Ullman.  The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[57]  S. Weir.  The Perception of Motion: Michotte Revisited , 1978 .

[58]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[59]  J. N. Bassili.  Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[60]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[61]  A NOTE ON ‘MICHOTTE'S EXPERIMENTAL METHODS’ AND ‘MICHOTTE'S IDEAS’ , 1973 .

[62]  R. B. Joynson.  MICHOTTE'S EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1971 .

[63]  W. Schiff,et al.  Stimulus factors in observer judgment of social interaction: facial expression and motion pattern. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  Beasley Na.  The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. , 1968 .

[65]  T. Natsoulas.  Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[66]  D. Boyle.  A Contribution to the Study of Phenomenal Causation* , 1960 .

[67]  P. F. Powesland,et al.  The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[68]  A. Gemelli,et al.  The influence of the subject's attitude in perception , 1958 .

[69]  H. Gruber,et al.  Effects of experience on perception of causality. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[70]  R. Shor,et al.  Effect of preinformation upon human characteristics attributed to animated geometric figures. , 1957, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[71]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[72]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .