Multialternative Decision by Sampling: A Model of Decision Making Constrained by Process Data
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Nigel Harvey,et al. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .
[2] David B. Dunson,et al. Bayesian data analysis, third edition , 2013 .
[3] Timothy L. Mullett,et al. Eye Movements in Strategic Choice , 2015, Journal of behavioral decision making.
[4] Eric T. Bradlow,et al. Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice , 2012 .
[5] R. Hertwig,et al. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. , 2006, Psychological review.
[6] Douglas H. Wedell,et al. (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.557 Testing Alternative Explanations of Phantom Decoy Effects , 2007 .
[7] Carey K. Morewedge,et al. Winners Love Winning and Losers Love Money , 2011, Psychological science.
[8] Alan D. J. Cooke,et al. Multiattribute judgment : Attribute spacing influences single attributes , 1998 .
[9] David E. Buschena,et al. Testing the Effects of Similarity on Risky Choice: Implications for Violations of Expected Utility , 1999 .
[10] J. Gold,et al. The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[11] Gordon D. A. Brown,et al. Decision by Sampling and Memory Distinctiveness: Range Effects from Rank-Based Models of Judgment and Choice , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[12] Alexander Chernev,et al. Context Effects Without a Context: Attribute Balance as a Reason for Choice , 2005 .
[13] Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al. Implications of Thresholds in Discrete Choice Modelling , 2006 .
[14] S. Shimojo,et al. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] James L. McClelland,et al. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. , 2004, Psychological review.
[16] A. Tversky. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .
[17] Ian Krajbich,et al. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.
[18] David Gal,et al. A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion , 2005, Judgment and Decision Making.
[19] R. Ratcliff,et al. Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.
[20] Andrew Heathcote,et al. The fragile nature of contextual preference reversals: Reply to Tsetsos, Chater, and Usher (2015). , 2015, Psychological review.
[21] J I Shaw,et al. Centrality Preferences in Choices Among Similar Options , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.
[22] A. Tversky,et al. Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .
[23] D. Medin,et al. Similarity and Alignment in Choice , 1995 .
[24] R. Dawes. Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .
[25] N. Anderson. Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .
[26] Donald Laming,et al. The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgements , 1984 .
[27] Sudeep Bhatia,et al. Associations and the accumulation of preference. , 2013, Psychological review.
[28] N. Christenfeld. Choices from Identical Options , 1995 .
[29] Philip L. Smith,et al. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.
[30] C. Plott,et al. The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the 'Endowment Effect,' Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations , 2005 .
[31] Alireza Soltani,et al. A Range-Normalization Model of Context-Dependent Choice: A New Model and Evidence , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[32] Colin Camerer. Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion , 2005 .
[33] A. Tversky,et al. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.
[34] Christopher P. Puto,et al. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .
[35] Shi Zhang,et al. Processing Product Unique Features: Alignability and Involvement in Preference Construction , 2001 .
[36] J. Little,et al. An Empirical Analysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods , 1994 .
[37] D. Kahneman,et al. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.
[38] Neil Stewart,et al. How to Make Loss Aversion Disappear and Reverse: Tests of the Decision by Sampling Origin of Loss Aversion , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[39] David E. Buschena,et al. Evaluation of similarity models for expected utility violations , 2011 .
[40] Neil Stewart,et al. On the Origin of Utility, Weighting, and Discounting Functions: How They Get Their Shapes and How to Change Their Shapes , 2015, Manag. Sci..
[41] L. Thurstone. A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .
[42] John N. Pinto,et al. Employees' perception of pay increases , 1989 .
[43] R. Nosofsky,et al. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.
[44] John W. Payne,et al. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .
[45] A. Parducci. Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.
[46] Scott D. Brown,et al. The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] A. Rubinstein. Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?) , 1988 .
[48] Timothy L. Mullett,et al. Implications of Visual Attention Phenomena for Models of Preferential Choice , 2016, Decision.
[49] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[50] A. Tversky,et al. Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .
[51] I. Simonson,et al. Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .
[52] Paul Slovic,et al. Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .
[53] A. Rangel,et al. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .
[55] Sabrina M. Tom,et al. The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk , 2007, Science.
[56] B. Dosher,et al. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[57] Sumio Watanabe,et al. A widely applicable Bayesian information criterion , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[58] D. H. Wedell,et al. Distinguishing Among Models of Contextually Induced Preference Reversals , 1991 .
[59] Kfir Eliaz,et al. Reason-Based Choice: A Bargaining Rationale for the Attraction and Compromise Effects , 2009 .
[60] Marius Usher,et al. Disentangling decision models: from independence to competition. , 2013, Psychological review.
[61] Eric J. Johnson,et al. Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[62] Larry D. Rosen,et al. An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[63] Charles M. Futrell,et al. Marketing executives' perceptions of equitable salary increases , 1985 .
[64] C. Mckenzie,et al. Transitivity in context: A rational analysis of intransitive choice and context-sensitive preference. , 2015 .
[65] J. E. Russo,et al. An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables , 1994 .
[66] Benjamin Heydecker,et al. A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds forperception in attribute values , 2006 .
[67] J. Knetsch. The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .
[68] N. Chater,et al. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice. , 2010, Psychological review.
[69] R. Nosofsky,et al. Seven plus or minus two: a commentary on capacity limitations. , 1994, Psychological review.
[70] V. Reyna. A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory. , 2012, Judgment and decision making.
[71] Gordon D. A. Brown,et al. Decision by sampling , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[72] Andrew M. Parker,et al. Understanding the mechanism and determinants of compromise effects , 2005 .
[73] R. Poldrack,et al. Prospect Theory and the Brain , 2009 .
[74] J. Pettibone. Testing the effect of time pressure on asymmetric dominance and compromise decoys in choice , 2012 .
[75] J. Payne,et al. Comparison selection: An approach to the study of consumer judgment and choice , 2013 .
[76] Alexander Chernev,et al. Extremeness Aversion and Attribute-Balance Effects in Choice , 2004 .
[77] Arthur B. Markman,et al. Processing Product Unique Features , 2001 .
[78] I. Simonson,et al. Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice , 1994 .
[79] Gordon D. A. Brown,et al. Absolute identification by relative judgment. , 2005, Psychological review.
[80] S. Reimers,et al. How Incidental Values From the Environment Affect Decisions About Money, Risk, and Delay , 2011, Psychological science.
[81] A. Tversky,et al. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .
[82] Aki Vehtari,et al. Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models , 2013, Statistics and Computing.
[83] William Samuelson,et al. Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .
[84] Manohar U. Kalwani,et al. Consumer Price and Promotion Expectations: An Experimental Study , 1992 .
[85] Jonathan W. Leland. Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies , 1994 .
[86] Scott Highhouse,et al. Context-Dependent Selection: The Effects of Decoy and Phantom Job Candidates , 1996 .
[87] Shinsuke Shimojo,et al. Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.
[88] J. Rieskamp,et al. Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[89] Nick Chater,et al. Examining the mechanisms underlying contextual preference reversal: Comment on Trueblood, Brown, and Heathcote (2014). , 2015, Psychological review.
[90] Adele Diederich,et al. The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[91] Lynn Hasher,et al. The Attraction Effect in Decision Making: Superior Performance by Older Adults , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[92] Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al. Computational Models of Decision Making , 2003 .
[93] Sunil Gupta,et al. Consumer price sensitivity and price thresholds , 2001 .
[94] Adele Diederich,et al. Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time , 2003 .
[95] Takao Noguchi,et al. In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions , 2014, Cognition.
[96] A. Chernev,et al. Perceptual Focus Effects in Choice , 2007 .
[97] N. Anderson. Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.
[98] Neil Stewart. EPS Prize Lecture: Decision by sampling: The role of the decision environment in risky choice , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[99] Andrew Heathcote,et al. The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice. , 2014, Psychological review.
[100] Alan D. J. Cooke,et al. Trade-offs depend on attribute range. , 1994 .
[101] Neil Stewart,et al. A decision-by-sampling account of decision under risk , 2008 .
[102] Wedell,et al. Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and Choice. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[103] Jennifer S. Trueblood,et al. The Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals 1 RUNNING HEAD : The Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals The Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals : Reply to Tsetsos , Chater , and Usher , 2015 .
[104] J. Townsend,et al. Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.