Presupposition and Policing in Complex Demonstratives

A lid lock apparatus is comprised of an opening formed in a vehicle-body, a lid pivotally mounted to the vehicle-body, a locking mechanism is connected to the plate and has a shaft which engages and disengages the lid when operated to its closed and opened condition, respectively. A driving mechanism which is arranged for releasing the engagement between the shaft and the lid when in the closed condition, is mounted on the locking mechanism and positioned in such a manner that the driving mechanism is set to be in close relationship to the plate while being perpendicular to the axis of the shaft.

[1]  C. R.,et al.  On referring , 1950 .

[2]  The Projection Problem of Presupposition , 2000 .

[3]  K. Bach.  Varieties of Reference , 1994 .

[4]  Jeffrey C. King.  Are complex 'that' phrases devices of direct reference ? , 1999 .

[5]  John McDowell,et al.  Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality , 2001 .

[6]  J. Higginbotham.  Competence With Demonstratives , 2002 .

[7]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[8]  Michael Glanzberg.  Against Truth-Value Gaps , 2004 .

[9]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .

[10]  J. Atlas,et al.  It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version) , 1981 .

[11]  David Braun,et al.  Structured characters and complex demonstratives , 1994 .

[12]  J. Dever.  Complex Demonstratives , 2001 .

[13]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis , 1995 .

[14]  I. Heim.  E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora , 1990 .

[15]  Keith S. Donnellan.  Reference and Definite Descriptions , 1966 .

[16]  William Frawley,et al.  Logico-Linguistic Papers , 1983 .

[17]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[18]  Judy L. Delin,et al.  Properties of It-Cleft Presupposition , 1992, J. Semant..

[19]  C. Williams,et al.  TRUTH AND OTHER ENIGMAS , 1979 .

[20]  Peter F. Strawson,et al.  Logico Linguistic Papers , 1974 .

[21]  E. Prince.  A COMPARISON OF WH-CLEFTS AND IT-CLEFTS IN DISCOURSE , 1978 .

[22]  Kirk Ludwig,et al.  The semantics and pragmatics of complex demonstratives , 2000 .

[23]  M. Simons.  Presupposition and Accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian Picture , 2003 .

[24]  P. Unger,et al.  Semantics and Philosophy , 1974 .

[25]  LAURI KARTTUNEN,et al.  PRESUPPOSITION AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT , 1974 .

[26]  S. Siegel.  The Role of Perception in Demonstrative Reference , 2002 .

[27]  Robert Stalnaker.  Context And Content , 1999 .

[28]  David I. Beaver.  Chapter 17 – Presupposition* , 1997 .

[29]  Jc Beall,et al.  Liars and heaps : new essays on paradox , 2003 .

[30]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[31]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[32]  Martin Davies,et al.  Individuation and the semantics of demonstratives , 1982, J. Philos. Log..

[33]  J. King.  Remarks on the syntax and semantics of day designators , 2001 .

[34]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[35]  N. Kadmon,et al.  Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus , 2001 .

[36]  S. Schiffer.  Indexicals and the theory of reference , 1981, Synthese.

[37]  G. Segal,et al.  Knowledge of Meaning , 2000 .

[38]  Emma Borg,et al.  Complex Demonstratives , 2000 .

[39]  木村 和夫.  Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[41]  John McDowell.  De Re Senses , 1984, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality.

[42]  Christopher Kennedy.  The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison , 1999 .

[43]  F. Inglis.  How To Do Things With Words. , 1971 .

[44]  Michael Glanzberg.  Presuppositions, Truth Values, and Expressing Propositions , 2005 .

[45]  M. Dummett.  Truth and other enigmas , 1978 .

[46]  P. Strawson.  III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .