SYNOPSIS Measured hourly solar radiation and cloud cover data were analysed. Regression analysis techniques were used to correlate the monthly-average-daily and monthly-average-hourly global and diffuse radiation with the corresponding cloud cover data. The mean bias error (MBE) is very small, representing less than 1% of the mean measured values. This indicates the regression models developed do not exhibit any long-term persistence in under- or over-estimation of solar radiation from cloud cover data. However, on an individual year basis, the MBE can be as high as 20% of the mean measured values for the hourly data prediction. It has also been found that using multiple regression techniques to correlate solar radiation with both the cloud cover data and the solar altitude can improve the prediction by about 5% as compared with the simple Angstrom- Prescott linear regression equation. This paper describes the analysis and presents the findings.
[1]
Warren G. Julian,et al.
Daylight measurement data: Methods of evaluation and representation
,
1992
.
[2]
J. C. Lam,et al.
Regression Analysis of Solar Radiation and Sunshine Duration
,
1996
.
[3]
Danny H.W. Li,et al.
Study of solar radiation data for Hong Kong
,
1996
.
[4]
Lu Enrong,et al.
Annual and seasonal global solar radiation climates in Yunnan, China
,
1992
.
[5]
Sheldon M. Jeter,et al.
Development of improved solar radiation models for predicting beam transmittance
,
1990
.
[6]
A. Angstroem.
Solar and terrestrial radiation
,
1924
.
[7]
Danny H.W. Li,et al.
Correlation between global solar radiation and its direct and diffuse components
,
1996
.