The importance of biotic entrainment for base flow fluvial sediment transport

Sediment transport is regarded as an abiotic process driven by geophysical energy, but zoogeomorphological activity indicates that biological energy can also fuel sediment movements. It is therefore prudent to measure the contribution that biota make to sediment transport, but comparisons of abiotic and biotic sediment flux are rare. For a stream in the UK, the contribution of crayfish bioturbation to suspended sediment flux was compared with the amount of sediment moved by hydraulic forcing. During baseflow periods, biotic fluxes can be isolated because nocturnal crayfish activity drives diel turbidity cycles, such that night-time increases above day-time lows are attributable to sediment suspension by crayfish. On average, crayfish bioturbation contributed at least 36% (430 kg) to monthly baseflow suspended sediment loads; this biotic surcharge added between 4.7 and 13.54 t (0.19 to 0.55 t km-2 yr-1) to the annual sediment yield. As anticipated, most sediment was moved by hydraulic forcing during floods and the biotic contribution from baseflow periods represented between 0.43 and 1.24% of the annual load. Crayfish activity is nonetheless an important impact during baseflow periods and the measured annual contribution may be a conservative estimate because of unusually prolonged flooding during the measurement period. In addition to direct sediment entrainment by bioturbation, crayfish burrowing supplies sediment to the channel for mobilization during floods so that the total biotic effect of crayfish is potentially greater than documented in this study. These results suggest that in rivers, during baseflow periods, bioturbation can entrain significant quantities of fine sediment into suspension with implications for the aquatic ecosystem and baseflow sediment fluxes. Energy from life rather than from elevation can make significant contributions to sediment fluxes.

[1]  M. Vincx,et al.  Bioturbation effects of Corophium volutator: Importance of density and behavioural activity , 2011 .

[2]  W. Ripple,et al.  The role of large predators in maintaining riparian plant communities and river morphology , 2012 .

[3]  P. Jouquet,et al.  Utilization of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to quantify the impact of earthworms on soil and carbon erosion in steep slope ecosystem: A study case in Northern Vietnam , 2010 .

[4]  J. Moore Animal Ecosystem Engineers in Streams , 2006 .

[5]  D. Eldridge,et al.  Surface destabilisation by the invasive burrowing engineer Mus musculus on a sub-Antarctic island , 2014 .

[6]  R. Guan,et al.  Feeding ecology of the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river , 1998 .

[7]  M. Power RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT BY INDIRECT EFFECTS OF GRAZERS: ARMORED CATFISH, ALGAE, AND SEDIMENT' , 1990 .

[8]  R. Wilby,et al.  Stormiest winter on record for Ireland and UK , 2014 .

[9]  B. Statzner,et al.  Sand Erosion by Mobile Predaceous Stream Insects: Implications for Ecology and Hydrology , 1996 .

[10]  T. Doeg,et al.  Effect of experimentally increasing concentration of suspended sediment on macroinvertebrate drift , 1991 .

[11]  Stephen P. Rice,et al.  Diel patterns of suspended sediment flux and the zoogeomorphic agency of invasive crayfish , 2014 .

[12]  M. Lafont,et al.  Ecosystem engineering at the sediment–water interface: bioturbation and consumer-substrate interaction , 2009, Oecologia.

[13]  T. Burt Diurnal variations in stream discharge and throughflow during a period of low flow , 1979 .

[14]  Simon Parry,et al.  Potential influences on the United Kingdom's floods of winter 2013/14 , 2014 .

[15]  M. Wolman A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material , 1954 .

[16]  M. Lucas,et al.  Movement and dispersal of the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in upland rivers , 2004 .

[17]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  The zone of vegetation influence on baseflow revealed by diel patterns of streamflow and vegetation water use in a headwater basin , 2002 .

[18]  Shintaro Watanabe,et al.  NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF NETSPINNING CADDIS LARVAE AND THE SUBSTRATUM ADHESION DUE TO THEIR INHABITATION IN A COBBLE RIVER WITH FEWER DISTURBANCES , 2005 .

[19]  C. F. Sawyer,et al.  Introduction to the special issue—zoogeomorphology and ecosystem engineering , 2012 .

[20]  Gerben J. de Boer,et al.  Modeling large-scale cohesive sediment transport affected by small-scale biological activity , 2008 .

[21]  Michael C. Rygel,et al.  Alluvial facies evolution during the Palaeozoic greening of the continents: case studies, conceptual models and modern analogues , 2011 .

[22]  J. Murray,et al.  Biological modifiers of marine benthic seascapes: Their role as ecosystem engineers , 2012 .

[23]  J. England,et al.  Time-series analysis of native and non-native crayfish dynamics in the Thames River Basin (south-eastern England) , 2014 .

[24]  F. Mermillod‐Blondin,et al.  Water–Sediment Exchanges Control Microbial Processes Associated with Leaf Litter Degradation in the Hyporheic Zone: a Microcosm Study , 2011, Microbial Ecology.

[25]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Darwinian origin of landforms , 2007 .

[26]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Biological energy in landscape evolution , 2009, American Journal of Science.

[27]  Jean-Claude Boisson,et al.  Chironomid larvae stimulate biogeochemical and microbial processes in a riverbed covered with fine sediment , 2008, Aquatic Sciences.

[28]  R. Guan Burrowing behaviour of signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) in the River Great Ouse, England , 1994 .

[29]  M. Carey,et al.  Turbidity‐induced changes in emergent effects of multiple predators with different foraging strategies , 2011 .

[30]  Matthew F. Johnson,et al.  Increase in coarse sediment transport associated with disturbance of gravel river beds by signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) , 2011 .

[31]  J. Wheaton,et al.  Preface: Multiscale feedbacks in ecogeomorphology , 2011 .

[32]  Claud I. Emrich University union building for the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia , 1970 .

[33]  Jozsef Szilagyi,et al.  Diurnal fluctuations in shallow groundwater levels and streamflow rates and their interpretation – A review , 2010 .

[34]  J. Svendsen,et al.  Muddied waters: suspended sediment impacts on gill structure and aerobic scope in an endangered native and an invasive freshwater crayfish , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[35]  Matthew F. Johnson,et al.  Animals and the Geomorphology of Gravel‐Bed Rivers , 2012 .

[36]  D. Beer,et al.  Bioturbation effects of Chironomus riparius on the benthic N-cycle as measured using microsensors and microbiological assays , 2002 .

[37]  F. Holtmeier Animals' Influence on the Landscape and Ecological Importance: Natives, Newcomers, Homecomers , 2015 .

[38]  R. Creed,et al.  Ecosystem engineering by crayfish in a headwater stream community , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[39]  F. Slater,et al.  A.L.I.E.N. databases: addressing the lack in establishment of non-natives databases , 2014 .

[40]  G. Klobučar,et al.  Distribution and dispersal of two invasive crayfish species in the Drava River basin, Croatia , 2009 .

[41]  R. Naiman,et al.  Biophysical interactions and the structure and dynamics of riverine ecosystems: the importance of biotic feedbacks , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[42]  Matthew F. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating the role of invasive aquatic species as drivers of fine sediment-related river management problems: The case of the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) , 2011 .

[43]  B. Peckarsky,et al.  Stoneflies as ecological engineers – hungry predators reduce fine sediments in stream beds , 1996 .

[44]  Athanasios N. Papanicolaou,et al.  In situ sensing to understand diel turbidity cycles, suspended solids, and nutrient transport in Clear Creek, Iowa , 2010 .

[45]  R. Guan Abundance and production of the introduced signal crayfish ina British lowland river , 2004, Aquaculture International.

[46]  K. Fortino Effect of Season on the Impact of Ecosystem Engineers in the New River, NC , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[47]  Erika Nilsson,et al.  The impact of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on the recruitment of salmonid fish in a headwater stream in Yorkshire, England , 2009 .

[48]  G. Harvey,et al.  Invasive crayfish as drivers of fine sediment dynamics in rivers: field and laboratory evidence , 2014 .

[49]  A. Flecker Habitat Modification by Tropical Fishes: Environmental Heterogeneity and the Variability of Interaction Strength , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[50]  D. Butler Zoogeomorphology: Animals as Geomorphic Agents , 1995 .

[51]  Justin P. Wright,et al.  The Concept of Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers Ten Years On: Progress, Limitations, and Challenges , 2006 .

[52]  J. Diéguez-Uribeondo,et al.  Structural damage caused by the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) in rice fields of the Iberian Peninsula: a study case , 2015 .

[53]  D. Schindler,et al.  Disturbance of freshwater habitats by anadromous salmon in Alaska , 2004, Oecologia.

[54]  K. Hall,et al.  Zoogeomorphology in the Alpine: some observations on abiotic–biotic interactions , 2003 .

[55]  D. Allen,et al.  Meta-analysis: abundance, behavior, and hydraulic energy shape biotic effects on sediment transport in streams. , 2015, Ecology.

[56]  M. Lucas,et al.  Winter movements and activity of signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in an upland river, determined by radio telemetry , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[57]  B. Statzner,et al.  Crayfish and fish as bioturbators of streambed sediments: Assessing joint effects of species with different mechanistic abilities , 2008 .

[58]  W. Cross,et al.  Toward Quantifying the Relative Importance of Invertebrate Consumption and Bioturbation in Puerto Rican Streams , 2008 .

[59]  T. Hamazaki,et al.  THE ROLE OF OMNIVORY IN A NEOTROPICAL STREAM: SEPARATING DIURNAL AND NOCTURNAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[60]  J. Nyssen,et al.  Spatio‐temporal sedimentation patterns in beaver ponds along the Chevral river, Ardennes, Belgium , 2014 .

[61]  M. Gerino,et al.  Influence of macroinvertebrates on physico‐chemical and microbial processes in hyporheic sediments , 2003 .

[62]  B. Statzner Geomorphological implications of engineering bed sediments by lotic animals , 2012 .

[63]  S. Rice,et al.  Reduced bed material stability and increased bedload transport caused by foraging fish: a flume study with juvenile Barbel (Barbus barbus) , 2014 .

[64]  B. Helms,et al.  The effects of 2 coexisting crayfish on an Appalachian river community , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[65]  J. Dunn,et al.  Competition and parasitism in the native White Clawed Crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes and the invasive Signal Crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in the UK , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[66]  L. Kaplan,et al.  Temporal dynamics of seston: A recurring nighttime peak and seasonal shifts in composition in a stream ecosystem , 2009 .

[67]  C. Townsend,et al.  Roles of crayfish: Consequences of predation and bioturbation for stream invertebrates , 2004 .

[68]  F. Mermillod‐Blondin The functional significance of bioturbation and biodeposition on biogeochemical processes at the water–sediment interface in freshwater and marine ecosystems , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[69]  J. Geist,et al.  Sex- and size-specific migration patterns and habitat preferences of invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana) , 2013 .

[70]  A. Dennis Lemly,et al.  Effects of Sedimentation and Turbidity on Lotic Food Webs: A Concise Review for Natural Resource Managers , 2000 .

[71]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The effect of removal by trapping on body condition in populations of signal crayfish , 2011 .

[72]  R. Hill,et al.  The UK Land Cover Map 2000: Construction of a Parcel-Based Vector Map from Satellite Images , 2002 .

[73]  J. Koenings,et al.  Effects of Turbidity in Fresh Waters of Alaska , 1987 .

[74]  N. K. Kaushik,et al.  Effects of Tubificid Worms on Denitrification and Nitrification in Stream Sediment , 1980 .

[75]  B. Cardinale,et al.  A mechanistic model linking insect (Hydropsychidae) silk nets to incipient sediment motion in gravel‐bedded streams , 2014 .

[76]  B. Statzner,et al.  Silk‐producing stream insects and gravel erosion: Significant biological effects on critical shear stress , 1999 .

[77]  C. Jones,et al.  Ecosystem engineers and geomorphological signatures in landscapes , 2012 .

[78]  D. D. Vleeschouwer,et al.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs , 2010 .

[79]  C. Davison IV.—On the Amount of Sand brought up by Lobworms to the Surface , 1891, Geological Magazine.

[80]  D. Holdich,et al.  The North American signal crayfish, with particular reference to its success as an invasive species in Great Britain , 2014 .

[81]  G. Malanson,et al.  The geomorphic influences of beaver dams and failures of beaver dams , 2005 .

[82]  J. Steiger,et al.  The emergence of an ‘evolutionary geomorphology’? , 2012 .

[83]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Reciprocal adjustments between landforms and living organisms: Extended geomorphic evolutionary insights , 2008 .

[84]  Matthew F. Johnson,et al.  The activity of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in relation to thermal and hydraulic dynamics of an alluvial stream, UK , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[85]  Bioturbation by a dominant detritivore in a headwater stream: litter excavation and effects on community structure , 2010 .

[86]  R. Herschy The velocity-area method , 1993 .

[87]  R. Brazier,et al.  Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. , 2008, Water research.

[88]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Salmon‐driven bed load transport and bed morphology in mountain streams , 2008 .

[89]  K. Hall,et al.  Animals as Erosion Agents in the Alpine Zone: Some Data and Observations from Canada, Lesotho, and Tibet , 1999 .

[90]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[91]  N. Dorn,et al.  Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.