EPC Methods: AHRQ End-User Perspectives of Rapid Reviews

[1]  S. Selph,et al.  Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[2]  David Hailey,et al.  RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? , 2008, ANZ journal of surgery.

[3]  M. Sampson,et al.  Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  M. Clarke,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[5]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Narrative Impressions of Literature: The Availability Bias and the Corrective Properties of Meta-Analytic Approaches , 2001 .

[6]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Incorporating evidence review into quality improvement: meeting the needs of innovators , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[7]  Dean Giustini,et al.  Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews , 2013, Online journal of public health informatics.

[8]  David Hailey,et al.  Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  A R Jadad,et al.  What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.