Examining the determinants of computer-assisted audit techniques acceptance from internal auditors' viewpoints

This study adopts the technology acceptance model (TAM) as the initial framework to examine factors leading to the acceptance of computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) from the viewpoints of internal auditors. In addition to the variables from TAM model, two external variables namely organisational support and system quality are augmented into the new model. In order to test the new model, this study conducts a survey of 117 internal auditors and analyses the data by using partial least squares (PLS). The results show that external variables have significant effects on both TAM's belief. Furthermore, most constructs of the TAM was confirmed.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[3]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[4]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[6]  Anne-Marie Croteau,et al.  Telemedicine adoption by different groups of physicians , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[8]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[10]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption , 2005, DATB.

[11]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[12]  Junaid M. Shaikh E‐commerce impact: emerging technology – electronic auditing , 2005 .

[13]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  A. F. Salam,et al.  An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Robert L. Braun,et al.  Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives , 2003 .

[17]  B. E. Cushing,et al.  Comparison of audit methodologies of large accounting firms , 1986 .

[18]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities , 2005 .

[19]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Diane Hamilton,et al.  Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[23]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[25]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[26]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[27]  Hung-Pin Shih,et al.  Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Yujong Hwang,et al.  Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  M. Rocío Martínez-Torres,et al.  A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of Intellectual Capital: An exploratory study , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[30]  David C. Yen,et al.  Auditing in the e-commerce era , 2004, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementation in a world of workstations and networks , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  An Empirical Investigation on End-Users' Acceptance of Enterprise Systems , 2004, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[35]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  The effect of training on auditors' acceptance of an electronic work system , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  William R. Kinney Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards , 1986 .

[39]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[41]  Dana R. Hermanson,et al.  Information Technology-Related Activities of Internal Auditors , 2000, J. Inf. Syst..