The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Arlinger,et al. Visual evoked potentials: relation to adult speechreading and cognitive function. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[2] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[3] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .
[4] Karen A Doherty,et al. Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Various Types of Masker Noises , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[5] B C Moore,et al. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. , 1992, British journal of audiology.
[6] Graham Naylor,et al. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[7] P. Wong,et al. Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[8] David Fabry,et al. Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry. , 2007, Journal of american academy of audiology.
[9] D. Poeppel,et al. The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[10] P. Stelmachowicz,et al. Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[11] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[12] A. Kam,et al. Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[13] Christopher A Brown,et al. Effects of Audibility and Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression on Consonant Recognition for Listeners with Severe Hearing Loss , 2009, Ear and hearing.
[14] Belinda A Henry,et al. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] M R Leek,et al. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Thomas Lunner,et al. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[17] G. Studebaker,et al. Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[18] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[19] Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[20] B E Walden,et al. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[21] Thomas Lunner,et al. Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[22] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Walter Schaeken,et al. A Dutch, computerized, and group administrable adaptation of the operation span test , 2002 .
[24] Michael F. Bunting,et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[25] C C Crandell,et al. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Ability: Implications for Hearing Aid Selection , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[26] R. Engle,et al. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] J R Dubno,et al. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] L. Humes,et al. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[29] Jyh-Horng Chen,et al. Aging Effects on the Activation of the Auditory Cortex during Binaural Speech Listening in White Noise: An fMRI Study , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.
[30] S. Folstein,et al. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.
[31] R. Patterson,et al. The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[33] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[34] D A Preves,et al. A New Technique for Quantifying Temporal Envelope Contrasts , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[35] Pamela E Souza,et al. Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[36] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[37] Pamela Souza,et al. Application of the envelope difference index to spectrally sparse speech. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[38] L E Humes,et al. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[39] S Rosen,et al. Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[41] T. Lunner,et al. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[42] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[43] Stephanie Bor,et al. Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[44] D D Dirks,et al. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[46] Cognitive Task Demands Modulate the Sensitivity of the Human Cochlea , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[47] J Jerger,et al. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.
[48] Richard J. Baker,et al. Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity , 1994, Hearing Research.
[49] John Dunlosky,et al. Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[50] Brian C J Moore,et al. The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[51] Katrin Krumbholz,et al. What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing? , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.
[52] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[53] Stephanie Bor,et al. Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[54] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[55] James M Kates,et al. Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[56] Robert V. Shannon. The relative importance of amplitude, temporal, and spectral cues for cochlear implant processor design. , 2002 .
[57] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.