Assessment of Educational Expectations, Outcomes and Benefits from Small Satellite Program Participation

This paper begins to characterize the educational outcomes that can be produced from student participation in a small spacecraft development program. We asked students what benefits they expected to receive from program participation and we asked them, at the end of the semester, what benefits they had received. We also characterized student performance through the use of post-participation Likert-like scale questions and the use of a widely-used questionnaire for assessing student research participation outcomes. We compare benefit expectation and attainment, characterize the level of benefits received across multiple types of participation and assess the effect of program participation on subject-specific learning. We also discuss plans to expand this study to a wider-scale analysis of the impact of small spacecraft participation.

[1]  Lori Simons,et al.  Lessons Learned from Experiential Learning: What Do Students Learn from a Practicum/Internship?. , 2012 .

[2]  Pekka Kangaslahti,et al.  A 6U CubeSat constellation concept for atmospheric temperature and humidity sounding , 2014, 2014 United States National Committee of URSI National Radio Science Meeting (USNC-URSI NRSM).

[3]  Michael Swartwout.  Secondary payloads in 2014: Assessing the numbers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  OpenOrbiter: A Low-Cost, Educational Prototype CubeSat Mission Architecture , 2013 .

[5]  Carol Cargill,et al.  An Industry View of Experiential Learning , 1995 .

[6]  Bernard Elbaum.  Why Apprenticeship Persisted in Britain But Not in the United States , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[7]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  The open prototype for educational NanoSats: Fixing the other side of the small satellite cost equation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  Travis D. Park,et al.  Experiential Learning Enhances Student Knowledge Retention in the Plant Sciences , 2012 .

[9]  G. Hunyadi,et al.  The University Nanosat Program: an adaptable, responsive and realistic capability demonstration vehicle , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[10]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  An Assessment of Educational Benefits from the OpenOrbiter Space Program , 2013 .

[11]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Student Expectations from Participating in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2013 .

[12]  Jeremy Bailey,et al.  A CubeSat Mission for Exoplanet Transit Detection and Asteroseismology , 2012 .

[13]  David J. Weeks,et al.  The First US Army Satellite in Fifty Years: SMDC-ONE First Flight Results , 2011 .

[14]  K. Snell.  The apprenticeship system in British history: the fragmentation of a cultural institution , 1996 .

[15]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Assessing the Value of the OpenOrbiter Program’s Research Experience for Undergraduates , 2014 .

[16]  Roland Coelho,et al.  ELaNa – Educational Launch of Nanosatellite: Providing Routine RideShare Opportunities , 2012 .

[17]  Aini Hussain,et al.  Creativity enhancement through experiential learning , 2012 .

[18]  Pekka Kangaslahti,et al.  CubeSat Constellation for Atmospheric Temperature and Humidity Sounding , 2013 .

[19]  John R. Rankin,et al.  Robotic Mission to Mars: Hands-on, minds-on, web-based learning , 2012 .

[20]  Michael Swartwout,et al.  The First One Hundred CubeSats: A Statistical Look , 2013 .

[21]  Paul Dickson,et al.  Sputnik: The Shock of the Century , 2002 .

[22]  Michael Taraba,et al.  Boeing's CubeSat TestBed 1 Attitude Determination Design and On­Orbit Experience , 2009 .

[23]  Yaron Doppelt,et al.  Implementation and Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a Flexible Environment , 2003 .

[24]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Evaluation of the Educational Impact of Participation Time in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2014 .

[25]  Albert Tsuda,et al.  Rapid Development using Tyvak’s Open Source Software Model , 2013 .