Consumption or prosumption? A question of resources

Purpose Despite the recent growth of the do-it-yourself market, very little is known as to how or why individuals actually choose to engage in prosumption behavior. The purpose of this study is to specifically examine the decision process of actors when determining the level of resource commitment and integration necessary to prosume or consume a service, thus offering insights to both managers and academics alike. Design/methodology/approach A multi-method study using both qualitative and quantitative research examines the decision of actors to consume or prosume a service. A conceptual model is presented and tested. Findings The results identify the primary drivers individuals considered when evaluating the resource commitment necessary for a make or buy decision. This research offers empirical support for the application of transaction cost analysis as an appropriate theoretical explanation of how actors decide to prosume or consume a service. The authors further suggest, based on these findings, that transaction cost analysis is a viable middle-range theory to explain the commitment and sharing of resources between actors engaged in co-production within the perspective of a service-dominant logic. Research limitations/implications Future research is needed to identify opportunities for hybrid models that consider the appropriateness of these findings within larger service networks, as well as potential moderating or mediating influences of the direct effects identified and investigated. Originality/value This study offers an initial attempt to provide a theoretical explanation for the resource integration decisions (e.g. make or buy) faced by individuals in a growing segment of the economy. The findings enable better informed strategies to be identified by both service providers and retailers.

[1]  S. Fox.  Domesticating artificial intelligence: Expanding human self-expression through applications of artificial intelligence in prosumption , 2018 .

[2]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic 2025 , 2017 .

[3]  R. Brodie.  Enhancing theory development in the domain of relationship marketing: how to avoid the danger of getting stuck in the middle , 2017 .

[4]  Kristina Heinonen,et al.  Customer-dominant logic: foundations and implications , 2015 .

[5]  Päivi Voima,et al.  Customer dominant value formation in service , 2013 .

[6]  James W. Gentry,et al.  Productive Consumption in the Class-Mediated Construction of Domestic Masculinity: Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Home Improvement in Men’s Identity Work , 2013 .

[7]  Marco Wolf,et al.  Circumventing Traditional Markets: An Empirical Study of the Marketplace Motivations and Outcomes of Consumers' Do-It-Yourself Behaviors , 2013 .

[8]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation , 2013 .

[9]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view , 2012 .

[10]  Jennifer D. Chandler,et al.  Roles as resources: A social roles perspective of change in value networks , 2011 .

[11]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing , 2011 .

[12]  Jaqueline Pels,et al.  Theorizing about the service dominant logic: The bridging role of middle range theory , 2011 .

[13]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  Quantifying Transaction Costs in Online/Offline Grocery Channel Choice , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[14]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[15]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Customer Integration and Value Creation , 2008 .

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value , 2008 .

[17]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[18]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression , 2005 .

[19]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[20]  D. Kahneman.  Maps of Bounded Rationality , 2002 .

[21]  A. Woodside,et al.  Executive and consumer decision processes: increasing useful sensemaking by identifying similarities and departures , 2001 .

[22]  Dominic F. Wilson.  Why divide consumer and organizational buyer behaviour , 2000 .

[23]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments , 2000 .

[24]  Lance A. Bettencourt,et al.  Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[25]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Determining Where to Shop: Fixed and Variable Costs of Shopping , 1998 .

[26]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications , 1997 .

[27]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change , 1997 .

[28]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions , 1996 .

[29]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[30]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study , 1993 .

[31]  Dale Fodness,et al.  From customer to competitor: consumer cooption in the service sector , 1993 .

[32]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  ALLIANCES IN INDUSTRIAL PURCHASING - THE DETERMINANTS OF JOINT ACTION IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[33]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[34]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence , 1988 .

[35]  E. Anderson.  Transaction costs as determinants of opportunism in integrated and independent sales forces , 1988 .

[36]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[37]  John A. Czepiel,et al.  A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. , 1985 .

[38]  John A. Czepiel,et al.  A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter , 1985 .

[39]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[40]  James R. Brown,et al.  The Industrial/Consumer Marketing Dichotomy: A Case of Insufficient Justification , 1984 .

[41]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[42]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[43]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[44]  Jagdish N. Sheth,et al.  Recent developments in organizational buying behavior / BEBR No. 317 , 1976 .

[45]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[46]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[47]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[48]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[49]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[50]  O. Williamson,et al.  Transaction cost economics and its uses in marketing , 2012 .

[51]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[52]  Erin Anderson,et al.  The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[53]  A. Strauss,et al.  Excerpts from : The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[54]  M. Laroche,et al.  Internet versus Bricks-and-Mortar Retailers: An Investigation into Intangibility and Its Consequences , 2005 .

[55]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[56]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  The Institutions of Governance , 1998 .

[57]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory , 1996 .

[58]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[59]  P. Kotler.  The Prosumer Movement : a New Challenge For Marketers , 1986 .

[60]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[61]  O. Williamson.  Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[62]  K. Arrow.  “ The Organization of Economic Activity : Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocation ” , 1969 .