Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM In dental rehabilitations that involve implants, the number of implants is sometimes smaller than the number of lost teeth. This fact can affect the biomechanical behavior and success of the implants. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical behavior of different implant positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three-dimensional models of the maxilla were created based on computed tomography images for 3 different anterior prosthetic rehabilitations. In group IL, the implants were placed in the lateral incisor positions with pontics in the central incisor positions; in group IC, the implants were in the central incisor positions with cantilevers in the lateral incisor positions; and, in group ILIC, one implant was in a lateral incisor position and one was in a central incisor position, with a pontic and a cantilever in the remaining positions. A 150 N load was distributed and applied at the center of the palatal surface of each tooth at a 45-degree angle to the long axis of the tooth. The resulting stress-strain distribution was analyzed for each group. RESULTS The lowest displacement of the prosthetic structure was observed in group IC, although the same group exhibited the largest displacement of the bone tissue. In the bone tissue, the von Mises stress was mainly observed in the cortical bone in all groups. The maximum value of the von Mises stress shown in the cortical tissue was 35 MPa in the implant that neighbors the cantilever in group ILIC. The maximum von Mises stress in the trabecular bone was 3.5 MPa. CONCLUSION The prosthetic configuration of group IC limited the displacement of the prosthetic structure but led to greater displacement of the bone structure. The use of a cantilever increased the stress concentration in the implant and in the bone structure adjacent to the cantilever under the conditions studied here.

[1]  D P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  P. Lipinski,et al.  Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge: finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Y C Loo,et al.  Application of finite element method in dental implant research , 2009 .

[4]  H. Chun,et al.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  The influence of a flexible coating on the bone stress around dental implants. , 1995, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Sloten,et al.  Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants - CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  M. Vitti,et al.  Evaluation of molar and incisor bite force in indigenous compared with white population in Brazil. , 2008, Archives of oral biology.

[8]  Boualem Serier,et al.  Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant , 2010 .

[9]  O. Eraslan,et al.  The finite element analysis of the effect of ferrule height on stress distribution at post-and-core-restored all-ceramic anterior crowns , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[10]  G. van der Perre,et al.  Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  H. Salama,et al.  Developing optimal peri-implant papillae within the esthetic zone: guided soft tissue augmentation. , 1995, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[12]  F. Mante,et al.  Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[13]  P. Pröschel,et al.  Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[14]  I. Naert,et al.  Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  Hakimeh Siadat,et al.  Stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants as a factor of labial bone thickness and occlusal load angles: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2014, The Journal of oral implantology.

[16]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  F. Isidor,et al.  Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  C. Misch,et al.  A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. , 2005, Implant dentistry.

[19]  Stefano Gracis,et al.  Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. , 2005, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[20]  Arturo N Natali,et al.  Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  P. Cury,et al.  Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  Cheng-Kung Cheng,et al.  Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[23]  Dinçer Bozkaya,et al.  Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  Kenneth J. Anusavice,et al.  Phillips' science of dental materials , 2013 .

[25]  I Naert,et al.  The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  Rui-Feng Wang,et al.  The dynamic natures of implant loading. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  V. Muglia,et al.  Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. , 2009, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  P P Binon,et al.  Implants and components: entering the new millennium. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  G Preti,et al.  Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  P. Coelho,et al.  Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns. , 2011, European journal of oral sciences.

[31]  David B. Burr,et al.  Skeletal Tissue Mechanics , 1998, Springer New York.

[32]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  K. Nemoto,et al.  Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.