Influence of biological kinematics on abstract concept processing

During a random number generation task, human beings tend to produce more small numbers than large numbers. However, this small number bias is modulated when motor behaviour, such as a turn of the head, is performed during the random number generation task. This result fits with the finding that number representation is linked to laterally oriented actions, with small- and large-magnitude numbers generally linked to movement towards the left or the right side of space, respectively. To test whether this number–space association is specific to human motor behaviours or extends to any type of laterally oriented movements, we assessed whether the presentation of biological or nonbiological leftward or rightward movement affected a subsequent random number generation task. Biological and nonbiological movements were obtained by varying the kinematic parameters of the movements. Biological kinematics represented the tangential velocity actually observed in a human pointing movement; nonbiological kinematics represented equivalent movements but with an inverse tangential velocity along the path. The results show that only the observation of biological movements induces a space–number bias whereas observing nonbiological movements does not. This finding is the first evidence of a link between a biological marker and the semantic representation of a concept as abstract as number.

[1]  M. Pavlova Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.

[3]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Dot counting by brain damaged subjects , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[5]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Influence of gaze observation on random number generation. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[6]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction , 2004, Neuroreport.

[8]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[9]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator , 2008, Current Biology.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics , 2012, Cortex.

[12]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Christian Graff,et al.  Four-Day-Old Human Neonates Look Longer at Non-Biological Motions of a Single Point-of-Light , 2007, PloS one.

[14]  Michael Andres,et al.  Actions, Words, and Numbers , 2008 .

[15]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Number generation bias after action observation , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Perception of Elliptic Biological Motion , 2006, Perception.

[17]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Biological motion processing , 1996 .

[18]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[19]  P. Viviani,et al.  Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Intention in motor learning through observation , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Creating number semantics through finger movement perception , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping , 2008, Cortex.

[25]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[26]  Yann Coello,et al.  Reading action word affects the visual perception of biological motion. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[27]  S T Boysen,et al.  Indicating acts during counting by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[29]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[30]  J. Pineda,et al.  Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  F. Mast,et al.  Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Joseph Costermans An Analysis of the Association Rates Between Numbers From 1 To 20 , 1990 .

[33]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task , 2008, Cognition.

[34]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Michael Andres,et al.  Let us redeploy attention to sensorimotor experience , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  S. Sanderson Intention in motor learning. , 1929 .

[38]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  Gesture in Early Counting: A Developmental Analysis , 1981 .

[39]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  M. Alibali,et al.  The function of gesture in learning to count: more than keeping track * , 1999 .

[41]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Finger-number interaction: an ideomotor account. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[44]  David L Wright,et al.  Error Detection Processes During Observational Learning , 2006, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[45]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Exploring number space by random digit generation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on the grip scaling of reach-to-grasp movements , 2012, Cortex.

[47]  Yann Coello,et al.  Anticipating the terminal position of an observed action: Effect of kinematic, structural, and identity information , 2011 .

[48]  Michael L. Anderson Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  Sesh Kamal Sunkara,et al.  Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[50]  A. Young,et al.  Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays , 2004, Perception.

[51]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.