The Determinants and Impacts of Aesthetics in Users’ First Interaction with Websites

Abstract Though aesthetics is generally acknowledged as an important aspect of website design, extant information systems (IS) research on web user experience has rarely studied what affects website aesthetics and how aesthetics influences users’ perceptions of the website and the organization behind the website. In this paper, we synthesize prior literature from different academic domains and propose users’ perceived quality of five design elements (i.e., unity, complexity, intensity, novelty, and interactivity) as determinants of website aesthetics. We further theorize the effects of aesthetics on users’ attitudes toward the website and their perception of the corporate image. Two studies were conducted to test the research model. In Study 1, we adopted a card sorting method and the results provide substantial support to the determinants of website aesthetics. In Study 2, we conducted a survey using ten company portal websites that were unknown to survey respondents. Our analysis further confirms the effects of users’ perceived quality of the five design elements on the perception of website aesthetics. The findings of Study 2 also show that users’ perception of aesthetics has significant impacts on perceived utility and their attitudes toward the website, which further affects the corporate image exhibited via the website. In addition, we find that in users’ first interaction with a website, perceived aesthetics has a larger impact on their attitudes toward the website than perceived utility.

[1]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  Facets of visual aesthetics , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  M. Holbrook.  Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features , 1986 .

[5]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[7]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[9]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Edward F. Alf,et al.  Asymptotic confidence limits for the difference between two squared multiple correlations : A simplified approach , 1999 .

[11]  M. Rader,et al.  A Modern Book of Esthetics , 1961 .

[12]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Designing Not Just for Pleasure: Effects of Web Site Aesthetics on Consumer Shopping Value , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[13]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Michael J. Sherrard,et al.  The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations : a resource-matching perspective , 2005 .

[15]  M. Beardsley,et al.  Aesthetics. Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism , 1959 .

[16]  David Heller.  Aesthetics and interaction design: some preliminary thoughts , 2005, INTR.

[17]  Na Li,et al.  The importance of affective quality , 2005, CACM.

[18]  Ned Hettinger.  The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature , 2016 .

[19]  Robert W. Veryzer.  The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research , 1995 .

[20]  Alan H. Goldman.  Beardsley's Legacy: The Theory of Aesthetic Value , 2005 .

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Product Design for the Long Run: Consumer Responses to Typical and Atypical Designs at Different Stages of Exposure , 2013 .

[23]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions , 2000, DIS '00.

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[26]  Kristiina Karvonen,et al.  The beauty of simplicity , 2000, CUU '00.

[27]  Rami Qahwaji,et al.  The Importance of Gender, IT Experience, and Media-Rich Social Cues on Initial Trust in E-Commerce Websites , 2010 .

[28]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Explaining and Predicting the Impact of Branding Alliances and Web Site Quality on Initial Consumer Trust of E-Commerce Web Sites , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Heribert Gierl,et al.  Can advertising elements improve consumer evaluations of brand extensions with a moderate or low fit , 2011 .

[30]  Nigel Kenneth Pope,et al.  THE EFFECT OF PROVOCATION IN THE FORM OF MILD EROTICA ON ATTITUDE TO THE AD AND CORPORATE IMAGE : Differences Between Cause-Related and Product-Based Advertising , 2004 .

[31]  Youn-kyung Lim,et al.  Interactivity Attributes for Expression-oriented Interaction Design , 2011 .

[32]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and psychobiology , 1975 .

[33]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Attributes of Web Site Usability: A Study of Web Users with the Repertory Grid Technique , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[34]  Dena S Cox,et al.  Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs , 2002 .

[35]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation , 2010 .

[36]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[37]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Affect in Web Interfaces: A Study of the Impacts of Web Page Visual Complexity and Order , 2010, MIS Q..

[38]  N. Montgomery,et al.  The Social Context of Temporal Sequences: Why First Impressions Shape Shared Experiences , 2013 .

[39]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[40]  Lisbeth Thorlacius,et al.  A model of visual, aesthetic communication focusing on web sites , 2002, Digit. Creativity.

[41]  J. Averill,et al.  Aesthetics and the Environment , 1998 .

[42]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Does Animation Attract Online Users' Attention? The Effects of Flash on Information Search Performance and Perceptions , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer's Urge to Buy Impulsively , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality , 2008, TCHI.

[46]  Danuta de Grosbois,et al.  Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: commitment, initiatives and performance. , 2012 .

[47]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[48]  Woo-Kyoung Ahn,et al.  Order effects in contingency learning: The role of task complexity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[49]  D. Budescu.  Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. , 1993 .

[50]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[51]  Tamás D. Gedeon,et al.  Neuroscience and a Nomological Network for the Understanding and Assessment of Emotions in Information Systems Research , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[53]  Robin Dix.  ADDISON AND THE CONCEPT OF ‘NOVELTY’ AS A BASIC AESTHETIC CATEGORY , 1986 .

[54]  I. Ajzen.  Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[55]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[57]  Amy L. Parsons,et al.  Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things , 2006 .

[58]  Sucheta Nadkarni,et al.  A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website Complexity , 2007, MIS Q..

[59]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[60]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[61]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[62]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Cognition and Environment: Function - ing in an Uncertain World , 1983 .

[63]  C. Martindale,et al.  Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. , 1990 .

[64]  Peter H. Bloch.  Product Design and Marketing: Reflections After Fifteen Years , 2011 .

[65]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[66]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[67]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[68]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Aesthetics and experience-centered design , 2008, TCHI.

[69]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[70]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages , 2011, TCHI.

[71]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[72]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An emerging model of Web site design for marketing , 1998, CACM.

[73]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[74]  Nicholas Wolterstorff,et al.  Art in action : toward a Christian aesthetic , 1980 .

[75]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations , 2007, Organ. Sci..