Making Sense of Technology Trends in the Information Technology Landscape: A Design Science Approach

A major problem for firms making information technology investment decisions is predicting and understanding the effects of future technological developments on the value of present technologies. Failure to adequately address this problem can result in wasted organization resources in acquiring, developing, managing, and training employees in the use of technologies that are short-lived and fail to produce adequate return on investment. The sheer number of available technologies and the complex set of relationships among them make IT landscape analysis extremely challenging. Most IT-consuming firms rely on third parties and suppliers for strategic recommendations on IT investments, which can lead to biased and generic advice. We address this problem by defining a new set of constructs and methodologies upon which we develop an IT ecosystem model. The objective of these artifacts is to provide a formal problem representation structure for the analysis of information technology development trends and to reduce the complexity of the IT landscape for practitioners making IT investment decisions. We adopt a process theory perspective and use a combination of visual mapping and quantification strategies to develop our artifacts and a state diagram-based technique to represent evolutionary transitions over time. We illustrate our approach using two exemplars: digital music technologies and wireless networking technologies. We evaluate the utility of our approach by conducting in-depth interviews with IT industry experts and demonstrate the contribution of our approach relative to existing techniques for technology forecasting.

[1]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[2]  LevinthalDaniel,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution , 2001 .

[3]  Jeffrey L. Funk,et al.  TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE WITHIN HIERARCHIES: THE CASE OF THE MUSIC INDUSTRY , 2007 .

[4]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[5]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Technology roles and paths of influence in an ecosystem model of technology evolution , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  A manager's guide to technology forecasting and strategy analysis methods , 1991 .

[7]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[8]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  A Primer on Sequence Methods , 1990 .

[9]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution , 2004 .

[10]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  ‘History-Friendly' Models of Industry Evolution , 2007 .

[11]  J. Ivery,et al.  Organizational Ecology , 2007 .

[12]  Business as a Living System: The Value of Industrial Ecology , 2001 .

[13]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  The nature of technological knowledge: are models of scientific change relevant? , 1984 .

[14]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[15]  Raghu Garud,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Internal Corporate Venturing Process , 1992 .

[16]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change , 1990 .

[19]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[23]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment , 1989, ICIS '89.

[24]  Martin Rinne,et al.  Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation , 2004 .

[25]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note , 1992 .

[26]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[27]  M. Iansiti,et al.  The New Operational Dynamics of Business Ecosystems: Implications for Policy, Operations and Technology Strategy , 2002 .

[28]  P. David Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science , 2007 .

[29]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  Visual Data in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[30]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  On the Complexity of Technological Evolution: Exploring Coevolution within and across Hierarchical Levels in Optical Disc Technology , 1999 .

[31]  A. Langley,et al.  A PROCESS STUDY OF NEW TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN SMALLER MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1994 .

[32]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[35]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Technological guideposts and innovation avenues , 1993 .

[36]  John Metcalfe,et al.  A theoretical approach to the construction of technological output indicators , 1984 .

[37]  A. Roland,et al.  Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. , 1995 .

[38]  Franco Malerba,et al.  History friendly models of industry evolution: the case of the computer industry , 1999 .

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Path Creation with Digital 3D Representations: Networks of Innovation in Architectural Design and Construction , 2003 .

[40]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[41]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[42]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[43]  C. James Bacon,et al.  The Use of Decision Criteria in Selecting Information Systems/Technology Investments , 1992, MIS Q..

[44]  R. Nelson Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[45]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[46]  Rob Kling,et al.  Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism , 1996 .

[47]  Jack Worlton,et al.  Some patterns of technological change in high-performance computers , 1988, Proceedings. SUPERCOMPUTING '88.

[48]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[49]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[50]  Anne Quaadgras Who Joins the Platform? The Case of the RFID Business Ecosystem , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[51]  A. V. D. Ven SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[52]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[53]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[54]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[55]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[56]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[59]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from Internet Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[60]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[61]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[62]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Strategic Information Technology Investments: Guidelines for Decision Making , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[64]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[65]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[66]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[67]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[68]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[69]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[70]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[71]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[72]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..