SDF-Bayes: Cautious Optimism in Safe Dose-Finding Clinical Trials with Drug Combinations and Heterogeneous Patient Groups

Phase I clinical trials are designed to test the safety (non-toxicity) of drugs and find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This task becomes significantly more challenging when multiple-drug dose-combinations (DC) are involved, due to the inherent conflict between the exponentially increasing DC candidates and the limited patient budget. This paper proposes a novel Bayesian design, SDFBayes, for finding the MTD for drug combinations in the presence of safety constraints. Rather than the conventional principle of escalating or de-escalating the current dose of one drug (perhaps alternating between drugs), SDF-Bayes proceeds by cautious optimism: it chooses the next DC that, on the basis of current information, is most likely to be the MTD (optimism), subject to the constraint that it only chooses DCs that have a high probability of being safe (caution). We also propose an extension, SDF-Bayes-AR, that accounts for patient heterogeneity and enables heterogeneous patient recruitment. Extensive experiments based on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the advantages of SDF-Bayes over state of the art DC trial designs in terms of accuracy and safety.

[1]  Zhiyang Wang,et al.  Learning for Dose Allocation in Adaptive Clinical Trials with Safety Constraints , 2020, ICML.

[2]  Doina Precup,et al.  Learning Modular Safe Policies in the Bandit Setting with Application to Adaptive Clinical Trials , 2019, AISafety@IJCAI.

[3]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Dose‐Finding with Two Agents in Phase I Oncology Trials , 2003, Biometrics.

[4]  Jay J H Park,et al.  Critical concepts in adaptive clinical trials , 2018, Clinical epidemiology.

[5]  M. Ratain,et al.  Dose-escalation models for combination phase I trials in oncology. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Bradley P Carlin,et al.  Hierarchical Commensurate and Power Prior Models for Adaptive Incorporation of Historical Information in Clinical Trials , 2011, Biometrics.

[7]  A. Harris,et al.  Phase I Study of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, AG014699, in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Sofía S Villar,et al.  Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Randomization for Multi-Arm Clinical Trials Using a Modified Forward Looking Gittins Index Rule , 2017, Biometrics.

[9]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Sequential Patient Recruitment and Allocation for Adaptive Clinical Trials , 2018, AISTATS.

[10]  Michael Branson,et al.  A Bayesian Case Study in Oncology Phase I Combination Dose-Finding Using Logistic Regression with Covariates , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[11]  Ravishankar K. Iyer,et al.  A Contextual-Bandit-Based Approach for Informed Decision-Making in Clinical Trials , 2018, Life.

[12]  N. Wages,et al.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial , 2015, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[13]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Sym,et al.  A UGT1A1 genotype-directed phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with fixed dose of capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). , 2016, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Lisa V. Hampson,et al.  Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them , 2018, BMC Medicine.

[16]  Gauri Joshi,et al.  A Unified Approach to Translate Classical Bandit Algorithms to the Structured Bandit Setting , 2018, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory.

[17]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Report of the long-term efficacy of two cycles of adjuvant bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin in patients with stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT): a risk adapted protocol of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[18]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.

[19]  A. Jimeno,et al.  A phase I study of sorafenib and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors with expanded cohorts in renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer , 2013, Investigational New Drugs.

[20]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  M. Gasparini General classes of multiple binary regression models in dose finding problems for combination therapies , 2013 .

[22]  Ying Yuan,et al.  A Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two Agents , 2009, Biometrics.

[23]  G. Rosner,et al.  Factors Affecting Combination Trial Success (FACTS): Investigator Survey Results on Early-Phase Combination Trials , 2019, Front. Med..

[24]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian dose finding in oncology for drug combinations by copula regression , 2009 .

[25]  F. Rojo,et al.  Efficacy and safety of dasatinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in first line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the phase II GEICAM/2010-04 study , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  Aurélien Garivier,et al.  Thresholding Bandit for Dose-ranging: The Impact of Monotonicity , 2017, 1711.04454.

[27]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Contextual Constrained Learning for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials , 2020, AISTATS.

[28]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Optimize Long‐Term Maintenance Dosing for Antiretroviral‐Naive Adults with HIV‐1 Infection , 2019, Advanced Therapeutics.

[29]  Bin Chen,et al.  Characteristics of Drug Combination Therapy in Oncology by Analyzing Clinical Trial Data on Clinicaltrials.Gov , 2014, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[30]  Thomas M Braun,et al.  A two-dimensional biased coin design for dual-agent dose-finding trials , 2015, Clinical trials.

[31]  Maryam Aziz,et al.  On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials. , 2019 .

[32]  Fangrong Yan,et al.  Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  W. Gilks,et al.  Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling Within Gibbs Sampling , 1995 .

[34]  Sébastien Bubeck,et al.  Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems , 2012, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[35]  Jack Bowden,et al.  Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challenges. , 2015, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[36]  Ying Yuan,et al.  A Bayesian dose‐finding design for drug combination clinical trials based on the logistic model , 2014, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[37]  S. Halabi,et al.  Oncology clinical trials : successful design, conduct, and analysis , 2010 .