The Motivation and Bias of Bureaucrats

Many individuals are motivated to exert effort because they care about their jobs, rather than because there are monetary consequences to their actions. The intrinsic motivation of bureaucrats is the focus of this paper, and three primary results are shown. First, bureaucrats should be biased. Second, sometimes this bias takes the form of advocating for their clients more than would their principal, while in other cases, they are more hostile to their interests. For a range of bureaucracies, those who are biased against clients lead to more efficient outcomes. Third, self-selection need not produce the desired bias. Instead, selection to bureaucracies is likely to be bifurcated, in the sense that it becomes composed of those who are most preferred by the principal, and those who are least preferred.

[1]  Mathias Dewatripont,et al.  The Economics of Career Concerns, Part II: Application to Missions and Accountability of Government Agencies , 1999 .

[2]  Canice Prendergast.  Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives , 2008 .

[3]  C. E. Clarke.  Policymaking for Social Security . By Martha Derthick. [The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1979] , 1980 .

[4]  Robert Dur,et al.  Incentives and Workers Motivation in the Public Sector , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Maitreesh Ghatak,et al.  Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents , 2003 .

[6]  G. Libecap,et al.  Bureaucratic Rules, Supervisor Behavior, and the Effect on Salaries in the Federal Government , 1989 .

[7]  Helen Hershkoff.  Public Law Litigation: Lessons and Questions , 2009 .

[8]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  # Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review , 2002 .

[9]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation crowding theory , 2001 .

[10]  James F. Wilson.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[11]  Robert Dur,et al.  From Public Monopsony to Competitive Market , 2004 .

[12]  Martha Derthick,et al.  Policymaking For Social Security , 1980 .

[13]  Canice Prendergast.  The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[14]  Canice Prendergast,et al.  The Limits of Bureaucratic Efficiency , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Amy Levin,et al.  Antecedents to Retention and Turnover among Child Welfare, Social Work, and Other Human Service Employees: What Can We Learn from Past Research? A Review and Metanalysis , 2001, Social Service Review.

[16]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society , 1966 .

[17]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  The choice between market failures and corruption , 2000 .

[18]  Kurt R. Brekke,et al.  Hospital Competition and Quality with Regulated Prices , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  A. Glazer,et al.  The Desire for Impact , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  J. Tirole,et al.  Formal and Real Authority in Organizations , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Phillip C. Wall.  The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[22]  D. Harkness,et al.  Supervision in Social Work , 2020, Supervision and Professional Development in Social Work Practice.

[23]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Organizational authority : superior-subordinate relationships in three public service organizations , 1965 .

[24]  J. Tirole,et al.  Modes of Communication , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  L. Blankertz,et al.  Turnover Intentions of Community Mental Health Workers in Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services , 1997, Community Mental Health Journal.

[26]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[27]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Police Accountability and the Media , 1984 .

[28]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[29]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  A further examination of managerial burnout: Toward an integrated model , 1993 .

[30]  M. Kosfeld,et al.  Competition, Cooperation, and Corporate Culture , 2007 .

[31]  Karen Wong,et al.  Accountability of Social Service Workers at the Front Line , 1980, Social Service Review.