Acquisition of cognitive compiling

Abstract Language involves both structure and process. Giving each its due, we present a cognitive process model and show how its empirical success is related to claims about syntactic structure. Innate constraints on syntax are a central issue in linguistic theory, so it is a matter of concern that a widely accepted view of phrase structure constraints (X-bar theory) appears to be violated in some recent comprehension experiments with children. However, what is directly observed in the experiments is not a syntactic structure but the execution of a plan. We present a language of process for representing such plans and thereby provide a unified explanation of several developmental phenomena, including the results of the above experiments and of new experiments suggested by our approach. The explanation is in terms of the cognitive resources required to formulate and execute a plan. Since the explanation is based on nonsyntactic processing, the children's syntax need no longer be held faulty. This conclusion invigorates the claim that the range of phrase structures available to children is biologically constrained.

[1]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Phrase Structure Grammar , 1982 .

[2]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Transformational Syntax : A Student's Guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory , 1981 .

[3]  David Lewis,et al.  Scorekeeping in a language game , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[4]  Muffy Emily Ann Siegel,et al.  Capturing the adjective , 1976 .

[5]  P. Carey,et al.  Why five-year-olds cannot understand before and after , 1972 .

[6]  A. Sheldon.  The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[7]  Yukio Otsu,et al.  Universal grammar and syntactic development in children : toward a theory of syntactic development , 1981 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky.  Reflections on Language. , 1977 .

[9]  H. Goodluck,et al.  Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses , 1982, Cognition.

[10]  E. Clark.  On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after , 1971 .

[11]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives , 1985 .

[12]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[13]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  The nature of syntactic representation , 1982 .

[14]  C. Chomsky.  The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10 , 1969 .

[15]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[16]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  Pronominal Reference: Child Language and the Theory of Grammar , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  T. Roeper,et al.  Children’s Use of Syntactic Structure in Interpreting Relative Clauses , 1978 .

[18]  Edward H. Matthei,et al.  The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences , 1982, Cognition.