Target tracking with binary proximity sensors

We explore fundamental performance limits of tracking a target in a two-dimensional field of binary proximity sensors, and design algorithms that attain those limits while providing minimal descriptions of the estimated target trajectory. Using geometric and probabilistic analysis of an idealized model, we prove that the achievable spatial resolution in localizing a target's trajectory is of the order of 1/ρR, where R is the sensing radius and ρ is the sensor density per unit area. We provide a geometric algorithm for computing an economical (in descriptive complexity) piecewise linear path that approximates the trajectory within this fundamental limit of accuracy. We employ analogies between binary sensing and sampling theory to contend that only a “lowpass” approximation of the trajectory is attainable, and explore the implications of this observation for estimating the target's velocity. We also consider nonideal sensing, employing particle filters to average over noisy sensor observations, and geometric geometric postprocessing of the particle filter output to provide an economical piecewise linear description of the trajectory. In addition to simulation results validating our approaches for both idealized and nonideal sensing, we report on lab-scale experiments using motes with acoustic sensors.

[1]  Vinayak S. Naik,et al.  A line in the sand: a wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking , 2004, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Approximating Polygons and Subdivisions with Minimum Link Paths , 1991, ISA.

[3]  Raghuraman Mudumbai,et al.  Information theoretic bounds for sensor network localization , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[4]  J. Singh,et al.  Tracking Multiple Targets Using Binary Proximity Sensors , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[5]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  MCMC-based particle filtering for tracking a variable number of interacting targets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Paolo Dario,et al.  A low-cost, composite sensor array combining ultrasonic and infrared proximity sensors , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[7]  Nabil H. Mustafa,et al.  Near-Linear Time Approximation Algorithms for Curve Simplification , 2005, Algorithmica.

[8]  Zack J. Butler,et al.  Tracking a moving object with a binary sensor network , 2003, SenSys '03.

[9]  J. Seaman Introduction to the theory of coverage processes , 1990 .

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation Fine-grained Network Time Synchronization Using Reference Broadcasts , 2022 .

[11]  Zijian Wang,et al.  A Distributed Cooperative Target Tracking with Binary Sensor Networks , 2008, ICC Workshops - 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[12]  D. McErlean,et al.  Distributed detection and tracking in sensor networks , 2002, Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002..

[13]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  Collaborative classification applications in sensor networks , 2002, Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop Proceedings, 2002.

[14]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  Efficient particle filter-based tracking of multiple interacting targets using an MRF-based motion model , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[15]  Mark L. Moran,et al.  Seismic source model for moving vehicles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  B. Ripley,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. , 1989 .

[17]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Dynamic fine-grained localization in Ad-Hoc networks of sensors , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[18]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Approximating Polygons and Subdivisions with Minimum Link Paths , 1991, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[19]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Arrangements and Their Applications , 2000, Handbook of Computational Geometry.

[20]  D. Manjunath,et al.  On the Path Coverage Properties of Random Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[21]  Henrik V. Sorensen,et al.  A level-crossing sampling scheme for A/D conversion , 1996 .

[22]  Jeung-Yoon Choi,et al.  On target tracking with binary proximity sensors , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[23]  Mark Coates,et al.  Distributed particle filters for sensor networks , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[24]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization , 2001, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice.

[25]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Apply geometric duality to energy-efficient non-local phenomenon awareness using sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[26]  Fabian Kuhn,et al.  Ad-hoc networks beyond unit disk graphs , 2003, DIALM-POMC '03.

[27]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[28]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Vehicle detection and tracking using acoustic and video sensors , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[29]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A Fully Decentralized Multi-Sensor System For Tracking and Surveillance , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..