Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research

Investigations into the environmental fate and effects of microplastics have been gaining momentum. Small, insoluble polymeric particles are implicated by scientists in a wide variety of studies that are used to suggest a potential for widespread impacts in freshwater and marine pelagic and sediment environments. An exponential growth in scientific publications and an increase in regulatory attention have occurred. However, despite these efforts, the environmental hazard of these particles is still unknown. To evaluate the hazard of microplastics within a risk assessment context, we need a way to evaluate the quality of experimental studies. We performed a thorough review of the quality and focus of environmental microplastic research, to understand the methodologies employed and how this may assist or distract from the ability of environmental risk assessors to evaluate microplastics. We provide guidance to improve the reliability and relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory and broader environmental assessments. Nine areas of needed improvement are identified and discussed. Important data gaps and experimental limitations are highlighted. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:1697-1703. © 2017 SETAC.

[1]  Mike Roberts,et al.  Principles of sound ecotoxicology. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  S. Klaine,et al.  Responses of Hyalella azteca to acute and chronic microplastic exposures , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  T. Galloway,et al.  Ingestion of Nanoplastics and Microplastics by Pacific Oyster Larvae. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  A. D. Vethaak,et al.  Do plastic particles affect microalgal photosynthesis and growth? , 2016, Aquatic toxicology.

[5]  C. Palmer,et al.  Defining an exposure–response relationship for suspended kaolin clay particulates and aquatic organisms: Work toward defining a water quality guideline for suspended solids , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  Mace G Barron,et al.  Determinants of variability in acute to chronic toxicity ratios for aquatic invertebrates and fish , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  K. Dawson,et al.  Accumulation and embryotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles at early stage of development of sea urchin embryos Paracentrotus lividus. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[9]  Mark Crane,et al.  Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[10]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  How we can make ecotoxicology more valuable to environmental protection. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  J. Moger,et al.  Effect of Microplastic on the Gills of the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Physical Adsorption of Charged Plastic Nanoparticles Affects Algal Photosynthesis , 2010 .

[13]  W. Kloas,et al.  Short-term exposure with high concentrations of pristine microplastic particles leads to immobilisation of Daphnia magna. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[14]  C. Rochman,et al.  Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[15]  F. Fernández.  Particle selection in the nauplius of Calanus pacificus , 1979 .

[16]  Thomas H. Hutchinson,et al.  Analysis of the ecetoc aquatic toxicity (EAT) database II — Comparison of acute to chronic ratios for various aquatic organisms and chemical substances , 1998 .

[17]  M. Frenzel,et al.  Influence of salinity, dissolved organic carbon and particle chemistry on the aggregation behaviour of methacrylate-based polymeric nanoparticles in aqueous environments , 2013 .

[18]  M. Huntley,et al.  Particle rejection by Calanus pacificus: discrimination between similarly sized particles , 1983 .

[19]  T. Ayukai.  Discriminate feeding of the calanoid copepod Acartia clausi in mixtures of phytoplankton and inert particles , 1987 .

[20]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  Marine microplastic debris: a targeted plan for understanding and quantifying interactions with marine life , 2016 .

[21]  L. Guilhermino,et al.  Single and combined effects of microplastics and copper on the population growth of the marine microalgae Tetraselmis chuii , 2015 .

[22]  Young Kyoung Song,et al.  A comparison of microscopic and spectroscopic identification methods for analysis of microplastics in environmental samples. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  F. Lagarde,et al.  Is there any consistency between the microplastics found in the field and those used in laboratory experiments? , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[24]  K. Kaposi,et al.  Ingestion of microplastic has limited impact on a marine larva. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Ellen Besseling,et al.  Fate of nano- and microplastic in freshwater systems: A modeling study. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[26]  Johan Robbens,et al.  Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  S. Corsi,et al.  Plastic Debris in 29 Great Lakes Tributaries: Relations to Watershed Attributes and Hydrology. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making , 2017, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[29]  H. Byrne,et al.  Ecotoxicological assessment of silica and polystyrene nanoparticles assessed by a multitrophic test battery. , 2013, Environment international.

[30]  Torkel Gissel Nielsen,et al.  A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvement. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[31]  Kenneth A Dawson,et al.  Nano-sized polystyrene affects feeding, behavior and physiology of brine shrimp Artemia franciscana larvae. , 2016, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[32]  Elaine S. Fileman,et al.  The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Jundong Wang,et al.  Extraction, enumeration and identification methods for monitoring microplastics in the environment , 2016 .

[34]  Karen Duis,et al.  Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[35]  Su-Jae Lee,et al.  Microplastic Size-Dependent Toxicity, Oxidative Stress Induction, and p-JNK and p-p38 Activation in the Monogonont Rotifer (Brachionus koreanus). , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  E. Gorokhova,et al.  The Effects of Natural and Anthropogenic Microparticles on Individual Fitness in Daphnia magna , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  C. Martin.  2015 , 2015, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[38]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L). , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Julian Moger,et al.  Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  M. Frenzel,et al.  Uptake and toxicity of methylmethacrylate‐based nanoplastic particles in aquatic organisms , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[42]  M. Nendza,et al.  Screening for potential endocrine disruptors in fish: evidence from structural alerts and in vitro and in vivo toxicological assays , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[43]  Marcus Eriksen,et al.  Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.