Patent Related Indicators for Assessing Knowledge-Generating Institutions: Towards a Contextualised Approach

This contribution aims at examining the extent to which patent related indicators are relevant for shedding light on the notion of excellence within knowledge-generating institutions. Traditionally, excellence has been looked upon as the ability to create interesting and valuable new scientific concepts, theories and data. From such a perspective, scientific excellence can be assessed through scientometric measures of publication output and impact. The recent interest in the ‘entrepreneurial’ phenomenon within knowledge-generating institutes justifies efforts to examine the relevancy of broadening the set of indicators used to assess such institutions into the direction of entrepreneurial excellence. In this paper we will examine the relevancy of using patent data in order to delineate such additional, more entrepreneurial oriented, indicators. The arguments and findings presented in this respect will lead us to a plea for the use of these indicators in a contextualized manner.

[1]  C. Freeman.  Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[2]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[3]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[4]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[5]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[6]  U. Schmoch.  Indicators of the scientific base of European patents , 1994 .

[7]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[8]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Basic Research and Industrial Innovation , 1995 .

[9]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Special Issue on Science Policy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1997 .

[11]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[12]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Internationalisation of European Universities: A Return to Medieval Roots , 1998 .

[13]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls.  The Geographic Distribution of Patents and Value Added Across European Regions , 1998 .

[14]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science , 1998 .

[15]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[16]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix of innovation: introduction , 1998 .

[17]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities , 1998 .

[18]  Hariolf Grupp.  Foundations of the economics of innovation , 1998 .

[19]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[21]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia , 1998 .

[22]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[23]  H. Grupp,et al.  Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation , 1999 .

[24]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Bibliometric assessment of research performance in Flanders: policy background and implications , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[26]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Managing academic R&D as a business at K.U. Leuven: context, structure and process , 2000 .

[27]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[28]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[29]  K. Debackere,et al.  Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology - Ii: The Multiple Uses of Technometric Indicators , 2002 .

[30]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[31]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[32]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[33]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Patenting Activity of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? , 2002 .

[34]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[35]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[36]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[37]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers , 2000, Scientometrics.

[38]  L. G. Soete,et al.  The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator , 2005, Scientometrics.

[39]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[40]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research , 1996, Scientometrics.