Procedure for Determining the Deployment Locations of Variable Speed Limit Signs to Reduce Crash Risks at Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks

The effectiveness of the variable speed limit (VSL) control is affected by the deployment locations of VSL signs. In this paper, a procedure was proposed to help determine the deployment location of VSL signs to reduce collision risks at freeway recurrent bottlenecks. The procedure is started from determining the hazardous recurrent bottleneck section by constructing the profile of the collision risks. The length of the hazardous section was determined according to the pre-selected threshold of crash risks. Various scenarios were considered for different lengths of VSL controlled sections with various densities of VSL signs. A modified cell transmission model (CTM) was used for modeling the traffic flow at the freeway bottlenecks under the VSL control. The VSL control factors were optimized by using the genetic algorithm. The safety effects of VSL were greatly affected by the placement of VSL signs. In general, the scenario with a longer VSL controlled section and more speed limit signs was more effective in reducing rear-end collision risks. The cost–benefit analyses showed that the placement of VSL signs in scenario C2 with the controlled section length of 11.7 mi and average VSL density of 1.0 mi had the best benefit/cost effect. Using 12 VSL signs, the collision risks were reduced by 69.16% and the total travel time was increased slightly by 7.73%. The procedure can help determine the optimal deployment of VSL signs on freeways, considering both the safety benefits and the cost.

[1]  Chris Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Traffic Safety , 2006 .

[2]  Zhibin Li,et al.  Collisions in Freeway Traffic , 2013 .

[3]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Split Models for Predicting Multivehicle Crashes during High-Speed and Low-Speed Operating Conditions on Freeways , 2005 .

[4]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the Impacts of Speed Variation on Freeway Traffic Collisions in Various Traffic States , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Stephen G. Ritchie,et al.  Real-time hazardous traffic condition warning system: framework and evaluation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Impact of Driver Compliance on the Safety and Operational Impacts of Freeway Variable Speed Limit Systems , 2011 .

[7]  C. Lee,et al.  2003. Real-time crash prediction model for the application to crash prevention in freeway traffic , 2003 .

[8]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a Control Strategy of Variable Speed Limits to Reduce Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Mark Robinson Examples of variable speed limit applications : speed management workshop , 2000 .

[10]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Impact of Traffic States on Freeway Collision Frequency , 2010 .

[11]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits , 2004 .

[12]  D. Ragland,et al.  Surrogate safety measure for evaluating rear-end collision risk related to kinematic waves near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  C. Daganzo THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[15]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessing Safety on Dutch Freeways with Data from Infrastructure-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2008 .

[16]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of traffic states on crash risks on freeways. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Variable Speed Limits: Safety and Operational Impacts of a Candidate Control Strategy for Freeway Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Moinul Hossain,et al.  Evaluating Location of Placement and Spacing of Detectors for Real-Time Crash Prediction on Urban Expressways , 2010 .

[19]  Simon Washington,et al.  Proactive detection of high collision concentration locations on highways , 2011 .