Does Stress Lead to a Loss of Team Perspective

One of the more well-established findings in the research literature is that stress leads to a restriction or narrowing of attentional focus. In the present study, we extend this research to the group context. We propose that, in a team environment, the narrowing of attention induced by stress may result in a shift in perspective from a broad team perspective to a more narrow or individualist ic self-focus, and this loss of team perspective may result in degraded team performance. The results of an empirical study found that stress resulted in a narrowing of team perspective and that team perspective was a significant predictor of team performance. Moreover, when the effects of team perspective were controlled, the effects of stress on team performance were substantially weakened. These results suggest that one way in which stress impacts team performance is by narrowing or weakening the team-level perspective required for effective team behavior. Research indicates that individuals respond to stress by a restriction or narrowing of attentional focus (Cohen, 1980; Combs & Taylor, 1952; Easterbrook, 1959). For example, Salovey (1992) showed that unexpected events may result in a shift of individual attention from external cues to a more internal self-focus. If we assume that this restriction of attention extends to social cues as well, then we may expect a narrowing of social perspective to occur at the group level. More specifically, we propose that a narrowing of attention at the group level is accompanied by a shift from a broader, team perspective to a more narrow, individualistic focus. Furthermore, in a team task environment, we expect this narrowing of perspective to lead to a degradation of performance. However, although considerable research has examined

[1]  E. Salas,et al.  Collective Behavior and Team Performance , 1992 .

[2]  S. Cohen,et al.  Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: a review of research and theory. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Effect of Team Building on Performance , 1999 .

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Stress , 1991 .

[5]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  SHAPE-assisted intuitive decision making and problem solving: Information-processing-based training for conditions of cognitive busyness , 1997 .

[6]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  E Salas,et al.  Vigilant and hypervigilant decision making. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  E. Salas,et al.  Team Performance and Training in Complex Environments , 1998 .

[9]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  S. Karau,et al.  The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. , 1992 .

[11]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias , 1990 .

[12]  E Salas,et al.  Effects of preparatory information on enhancing performance under stress. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  H C Foushee,et al.  The role of communications, socio-psychological, and personality factors in the maintenance of crew coordination. , 1982, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[15]  E. Torrance The Behavior of Small Groups Under the Stress Conditions of "Survival" , 1954 .

[16]  P. Salovey Mood-induced self-focused attention. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. , 1991 .

[18]  B. Mullen,et al.  Focus of attention in groups: a self-attention perspective. , 1989, The Journal of social psychology.

[19]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[20]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Levels of Thinking , 1990 .

[22]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[23]  H. Foushee,et al.  Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance , 1984 .

[24]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[25]  K. E. Mathews,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE LEVEL AS A DETERMINANT OF HELPING BEHAVIOR , 1975 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[28]  Catherine E. Volpe,et al.  Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requirements , 1995 .

[29]  J. Rotton,et al.  Loud speech, conglomerate noise, and behavioral aftereffects. , 1978, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[31]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The trouble with friendly faces: skilled performance with a supportive audience. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Combs,et al.  The effect of the perception of mild degrees of threat on performance. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[33]  R. Baumeister Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[35]  Robert Liebendorfer Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[36]  P. Lehrer,et al.  Principles And Practice Of Stress Management , 1984 .

[37]  S. Karau,et al.  Utility and limitations of the SHAPE-assisted intuitive decision-making procedure. , 1997 .

[38]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .