Marginal blind deconvolution of adaptive optics retinal images.

Adaptive Optics corrected flood imaging of the retina has been in use for more than a decade and is now a well-developed technique. Nevertheless, raw AO flood images are usually of poor contrast because of the three-dimensional nature of the imaging, meaning that the image contains information coming from both the in-focus plane and the out-of-focus planes of the object, which also leads to a loss in resolution. Interpretation of such images is therefore difficult without an appropriate post-processing, which typically includes image deconvolution. The deconvolution of retina images is difficult because the point spread function (PSF) is not well known, a problem known as blind deconvolution. We present an image model for dealing with the problem of imaging a 3D object with a 2D conventional imager in which the recorded 2D image is a convolution of an invariant 2D object with a linear combination of 2D PSFs. The blind deconvolution problem boils down to estimating the coefficients of the PSF linear combination. We show that the conventional method of joint estimation fails even for a small number of coefficients. We derive a marginal estimation of the unknown parameters (PSF coefficients, object Power Spectral Density and noise level) followed by a MAP estimation of the object. We show that the marginal estimation has good statistical convergence properties and we present results on simulated and experimental data.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  On Jointly Estimating Parameters and Missing Data by Maximizing the Complete-Data Likelihood , 1983 .

[2]  Yves Goussard,et al.  A new algorithm for iterative deconvolution of sparse spike trains , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[3]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Perfect blind restoration of images blurred by multiple filters: theory and efficient algorithms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  David R Williams,et al.  Deconvolution of adaptive optics retinal images. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Eric Thiebaut,et al.  Optimization issues in blind deconvolution algorithms , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  Ali Mohammad-Djafari Inverse Problems in Vision and 3D Tomography , 2009 .

[8]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis II , 2002 .

[9]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Myopic deconvolution of adaptive optics images by use of object and point-spread function power spectra. , 1998, Applied optics.

[10]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications , 1988 .

[11]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2001 .

[12]  Jungtae Rha,et al.  Adaptive optics flood-illumination camera for high speed retinal imaging. , 2003, Optics express.

[13]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2013 .

[14]  J. Conan,et al.  MISTRAL: a myopic edge-preserving image restoration method, with application to astronomical adaptive-optics-corrected long-exposure images. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  T. Hebert,et al.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2002, Optics express.

[16]  Francois Lacombe,et al.  Towards wide-field retinal imaging with adaptive optics , 2004 .

[17]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Statistical behavior of joint least-square estimation in the phase diversity context , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Jérôme Idier,et al.  Marginal estimation of aberrations and image restoration by use of phase diversity. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.