Dynamics of gene silencing during X inactivation using allele-specific RNA-seq

BackgroundDuring early embryonic development, one of the two X chromosomes in mammalian female cells is inactivated to compensate for a potential imbalance in transcript levels with male cells, which contain a single X chromosome. Here, we use mouse female embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with non-random X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and polymorphic X chromosomes to study the dynamics of gene silencing over the inactive X chromosome by high-resolution allele-specific RNA-seq.ResultsInduction of XCI by differentiation of female ESCs shows that genes proximal to the X-inactivation center are silenced earlier than distal genes, while lowly expressed genes show faster XCI dynamics than highly expressed genes. The active X chromosome shows a minor but significant increase in gene activity during differentiation, resulting in complete dosage compensation in differentiated cell types. Genes escaping XCI show little or no silencing during early propagation of XCI. Allele-specific RNA-seq of neural progenitor cells generated from the female ESCs identifies three regions distal to the X-inactivation center that escape XCI. These regions, which stably escape during propagation and maintenance of XCI, coincide with topologically associating domains (TADs) as present in the female ESCs. Also, the previously characterized gene clusters escaping XCI in human fibroblasts correlate with TADs.ConclusionsThe gene silencing observed during XCI provides further insight in the establishment of the repressive complex formed by the inactive X chromosome. The association of escape regions with TADs, in mouse and human, suggests that TADs are the primary targets during propagation of XCI over the X chromosome.

[1]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[2]  P. Avner,et al.  Role play in X-inactivation [published erratum appears in Hum Mol Genet 1994 Nov;3(11):2092] , 1994 .

[3]  V. Chapman,et al.  Escape from X inactivation of Smcx is preceded by silencing during mouse development , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Susan J Clark,et al.  Action at a distance: epigenetic silencing of large chromosomal regions in carcinogenesis. , 2007, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Dynamic, Random Monoallelic Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells , 2014, Science.

[6]  M. Lyon.  Gene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.) , 1961, Nature.

[7]  Heng Li,et al.  Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples , 2014, Bioinform..

[8]  Hanlin Gao,et al.  Transcriptome-Wide Survey of Mouse CNS-Derived Cells Reveals Monoallelic Expression within Novel Gene Families , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  G. Daley,et al.  Dynamic instability of genomic methylation patterns in pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[10]  C. Disteche,et al.  Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome. , 2006, Genes & development.

[11]  M. Gut,et al.  Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[12]  E. Lander,et al.  The Xist lncRNA Exploits Three-Dimensional Genome Architecture to Spread Across the X Chromosome , 2013, Science.

[13]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus , 1992, Cell.

[14]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Antisense Transcription through theXist Locus Mediates Tsix Function in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[16]  L. Jouneau,et al.  Stable methylation at promoters distinguishes epiblast stem cells from embryonic stem cells and the in vivo epiblasts. , 2014, Stem cells and development.

[17]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Escape from X Inactivation Varies in Mouse Tissues , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[18]  J. Gribnau,et al.  X chromosome inactivation in the cycle of life , 2012, Development.

[19]  Hengbin Wang,et al.  Role of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Methylation in X Inactivation , 2003, Science.

[20]  J. Gribnau,et al.  Combined DNA-RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to study X chromosome inactivation in differentiated female mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[21]  E. Heard,et al.  A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. , 2006, Genes & development.

[22]  Joost Gribnau,et al.  The trans-activator RNF12 and cis-acting elements effectuate X chromosome inactivation independent of X-pairing. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[23]  Edith Heard,et al.  High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation. , 2009, Genome research.

[24]  M. Blasco,et al.  Telomere shortening relaxes X chromosome inactivation and forces global transcriptome alterations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Gribnau,et al.  RNF12 Activates Xist and Is Essential for X Chromosome Inactivation , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[26]  Toshiro K. Ohsumi,et al.  Spreading of X chromosome inactivation via a hierarchy of defined Polycomb stations , 2012, Genome research.

[27]  Serban Nacu,et al.  Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads , 2010, Bioinform..

[28]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[29]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  The Long Noncoding RNA, Jpx, Is a Molecular Switch for X Chromosome Inactivation , 2010, Cell.

[30]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Genes that Escape X-Inactivation in Humans Have High Intraspecific Variability in Expression, Are Associated with Mental Impairment but Are Not Slow Evolving , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  Thomas M. Keane,et al.  Sequence-based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome , 2011, Nature.

[32]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  X Chromosome Inactivation Is Mediated by Xist RNA Stabilization , 1997, Cell.

[33]  E. Barillot,et al.  Developmental dynamics and disease potential of random monoallelic gene expression. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[34]  J. Nichols,et al.  Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency , 2009, Development.

[35]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  New and Xisting regulatory mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[37]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[38]  L. Jouneau,et al.  Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Epiblast Stem Cells Are Transcriptionally and Epigenetically Distinguishable from Their Fertilized‐Derived Counterparts , 2010, Stem cells.

[39]  C. Disteche,et al.  Comparative sequence and x-inactivation analyses of a domain of escape in human xp11.2 and the conserved segment in mouse. , 2004, Genome research.

[40]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[41]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Ftx is a non-coding RNA which affects Xist expression and chromatin structure within the X-inactivation center region. , 2011, Human molecular genetics.

[42]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  HiTC - Exploration of High Throughput ’C’ experiments , 2013 .

[43]  H. Willard,et al.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females , 2005, Nature.

[44]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[45]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  The two active X chromosomes in female ESCs block exit from the pluripotent state by modulating the ESC signaling network. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[46]  R. McKay,et al.  New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[47]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Maternal Rnf12/RLIM is required for imprinted X chromosome inactivation in mice , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Targeted Mutagenesis of Tsix Leads to Nonrandom X Inactivation , 1999, Cell.

[49]  P. Avner,et al.  Role play in X-inactivation. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[50]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[51]  F. Grosveld,et al.  RNF12 Is an X-Encoded Dose-Dependent Activator of X Chromosome Inactivation , 2009, Cell.

[52]  Martin Leeb,et al.  Xist and the order of silencing , 2007, EMBO reports.

[53]  M. Trotter,et al.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos , 2007, Nature.

[54]  C. Disteche,et al.  Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission , 1997, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[55]  M. Daly,et al.  PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[56]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[57]  FGF signalling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency , 2013, Clinical Epigenetics.

[58]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[59]  Jeroen Demmers,et al.  RNF12 initiates X-chromosome inactivation by targeting REX1 for degradation , 2012, Nature.

[60]  Wei Sun,et al.  Site-Specific Silencing of Regulatory Elements as a Mechanism of X Inactivation , 2012, Cell.

[61]  W. V. van IJcken,et al.  The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. , 2011, Genes & development.

[62]  A. Wutz.  Gene silencing in X-chromosome inactivation: advances in understanding facultative heterochromatin formation , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[63]  J. Mcneil,et al.  XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  J. Shendure,et al.  Global survey of escape from X inactivation by RNA-sequencing in mouse. , 2010, Genome research.

[65]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Mammalian X upregulation is associated with enhanced transcription initiation, RNA half-life, and MOF-mediated H4K16 acetylation. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[66]  Kirsten R. McEwen,et al.  Naïve pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[67]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Jpx RNA Activates Xist by Evicting CTCF , 2013, Cell.

[68]  Thomas M. Keane,et al.  Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation , 2011, Nature.

[69]  P. Avner,et al.  Tsix-mediated repression of Xist accumulation is not sufficient for normal random X inactivation. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[70]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Dosage Compensation in the Mouse Balances Up-Regulation and Silencing of X-Linked Genes , 2007, PLoS biology.

[71]  L. Carrel,et al.  Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD , 2011, Mammalian Genome.

[72]  W. Reik,et al.  FGF Signaling Inhibition in ESCs Drives Rapid Genome-wide Demethylation to the Epigenetic Ground State of Pluripotency , 2013, Clinical Epigenetics.

[73]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  The Transcriptional and Epigenomic Foundations of Ground State Pluripotency , 2012, Cell.

[74]  J. Sedat,et al.  Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre , 2012, Nature.

[75]  J. Mcneil,et al.  The X chromosome is organized into a gene-rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[77]  Eleazar Eskin,et al.  A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains , 2007, Nature.

[78]  J. Mattick,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA stability , 2012, Genome research.

[79]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  Molecular coupling of Tsix regulation and pluripotency , 2010, Nature.

[80]  M. A. Goldman,et al.  Mammalian X chromosome inactivation. , 1992, Molecular genetic medicine.

[81]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[82]  Dominic P. Norris,et al.  The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus , 1992, Cell.