Three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography: gated versus nongated techniques.

The purpose of this study was to compare gated with nongated three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography in terms of the ability to demonstrate fetal cardiac anatomy. We examined nine fetuses in utero using conventional two‐dimensional sonographic imaging equipment, an electromagnetic position sensor, and a computer‐graphics workstation. Free‐hand sweeps were performed through the fetal heart and great vessels in either transverse or sagittal orientations with respect to the fetal heart. Seven transverse and five sagittal sweeps were selected for reconstruction and analysis. Cardiac gating was performed by using a temporal Fourier transform to determine the fundamental frequency of cardiac motion. Two‐dimensional data from each sweep were reprojected to a series of volume data sets. Each series was then condensed to a single volume, so that each two‐dimensional sweep could be compared with its respective gated and nongated volume data sets. The two‐dimensional data were reviewed utilizing a display with forward and backward cineloop capability. The gated and nongated volume data sets were displayed interactively as a series of three orthogonal planes, with the ability of the observer to control the location of each image plane within the volume. The gated data were animated with variable display frame rates. Conventional two‐dimensional imaging provided a fairly complete evaluation of the fetal heart when scanning included the four‐chamber view with a sweep across the outflow tracts. Nongated three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography allowed visualization of some structures and views not demonstrated with two‐dimensional ultrasonography. Gated three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography provided significantly better visualization and comprehension of cardiac anatomy than nongated three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography. The superiority of gated over nongated three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography appears to come from both improved image quality and the anatomic clues that derive from the ability to view cardiac motion.

[1]  M. Vogel,et al.  Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography with a computed tomography imaging probe: initial clinical experience with transthoracic application in infants and children with congenital heart defects. , 1994, British heart journal.

[2]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Selection and identification of standard cardiac views from three-dimensional volume scans of the fetal thorax. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  F. Chang,et al.  Fetal heart volume assessment by three‐dimensional ultrasound , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  N G Pandian,et al.  Delineation of site, relative size and dynamic geometry of atrial septal defects by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  T. Ryan,et al.  A systematic approach to echocardiographic image acquisition and three-dimensional reconstruction with a subxiphoid rotational scan. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  J Deng,et al.  Fetal echocardiography in three and four dimensions. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Eric Jauniaux,et al.  Selection and identification of standard cardiac views from three‐dimensional volume scans of the fetal thorax. , 1996 .

[8]  T R Nelson,et al.  Usefulness of gated three-dimensional fetal echocardiography to reconstruct and display structures not visualized with two-dimensional imaging. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three‐dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: acquisition, analysis, and display. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  A Salustri,et al.  Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography in adult patients with congenital heart disease. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  E Merz,et al.  Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  P. Summers,et al.  Evaluation of three‐dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital heart anomalies in fetal cardiac specimens , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  D E Grobbee,et al.  Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in normal pregnancy. , 1996, Circulation.

[14]  J I Hoffman,et al.  Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.