Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in south-eastern Africa

Land degradation response actions need motivated stakeholders and investments to improve land management. In this study we present methods to prioritise locations for degradation mitigation investments based on stakeholder preferences for ecosystem services. We combine participatory and spatial modelling approaches and apply these for Zambia, South Africa, and Tanzania to: i) prioritise ecosystem services in each country; ii) to map the supply of these ecosystem services in each country, and; iii) prioritise areas important for investment for the continuous delivery of these ecosystem services based on their vulnerability to land degradation. We interviewed 31 stakeholders from governmental and non-governmental organizations to select the most important ecosystem services per county. Stakeholders were also asked to indicate on national maps the hotspots of these ecosystem services and locations with a high degradation risk. We then assessed the supply of the stakeholder-selected ecosystem services and land degradation risk using GIS-based spatial models. We found that for each country the spatial extent and magnitude of ecosystem services supply and land degradation based on GIS data coincides with stakeholder knowledge in some locations. In the context of supporting national level policy to achieve land degradation neutrality as proposed by the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification we argue that the correct representation, the level of acceptance, and use of modelled outputs to support decisions will be greater when model outputs are corroborated by stakeholder knowledge. Ecosystem services that are identified as “important” by diverse stakeholder groups have a broader level of awareness and could therefore drive motivations, commitments, and actions towards improved land management, contributing to land degradation neutrality.

[1]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  A multi-disciplinary approach to understanding the impacts of mines on traditional uses of water in Northern Mongolia. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Lindsay C Stringer,et al.  Channelling science into policy: enabling best practices from research on land degradation and sustainable land management in dryland Africa. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Greg Brown,et al.  Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation , 2015 .

[4]  N. Crossman,et al.  Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality , 2009 .

[5]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  Christopher Pettit,et al.  Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives , 2011 .

[7]  Sander Jacobs,et al.  Nature‐Based Solutions for Europe's Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[8]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  A. Dougill,et al.  The role of forest provisioning ecosystem services in coping with household stresses and shocks in Miombo woodlands, Zambia , 2013 .

[10]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  S. Dufour,et al.  Mapping multiple ecosystem services indicators: Toward an objective-oriented approach , 2016 .

[12]  Mark Horridge,et al.  Integrated water and economic modelling of the impacts of water market instruments on the South African economy , 2008 .

[13]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Ecosystem services visualization and communication: A demand analysis approach for designing information and conceptualizing decision support systems , 2015 .

[14]  E. Barbier The Economic Linkages Between Rural Poverty and Land Degradation: Some Evidence from Africa , 2000 .

[15]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Editorial: Best practices for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[16]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[17]  Samaneh Shokravi,et al.  Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[19]  Jürgen Vogt,et al.  Science for improving the monitoring and assessment of dryland degradation , 2011 .

[20]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Greg Brown,et al.  Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research , 2014 .

[22]  Lars Hein,et al.  Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting , 2015 .

[23]  Paul Peeters,et al.  Tourism and water use: supply, demand, and security. An international review. , 2012 .

[24]  Anne Larigauderie,et al.  A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People , 2015, PLoS biology.

[25]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[27]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Measurement matters in managing landscape carbon , 2015 .

[29]  C. Colvin,et al.  Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  R. Rai,et al.  Assessing community values to support mapping of ecosystem services in the Koshi river basin, Nepal , 2015 .

[31]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[32]  Carlos Montes,et al.  Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders׳ profiles , 2015 .

[33]  Prem S. Bindraban,et al.  Assessing the impact of soil degradation on food production , 2012 .

[34]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[35]  Martha B. Dunbar,et al.  Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: Understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society , 2013 .

[36]  K. Esler,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  A. Cottam,et al.  Using Social Media to Measure the Contribution of Red List Species to the Nature-Based Tourism Potential of African Protected Areas , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Z. Lindo,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values , 2015 .

[39]  H. Wittmer,et al.  “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making , 2013 .

[40]  F. Kalaba Barriers to policy implementation and implications for Zambia's forest ecosystems , 2016 .