Instructional support and implementation structure during elementary teachers’ science education simulation use

ABSTRACT This investigation sought to identify patterns in elementary science teachers’ computer simulation use, particularly implementation structures and instructional supports commonly employed by teachers. Data included video-recorded science lessons of 96 elementary teachers who used computer simulations in one or more science lessons. Results indicated teachers used a one-to-one student-to-computer ratio most often either during class-wide individual computer use or during a rotating station structure. Worksheets, general support, and peer collaboration were the most common forms of instructional support. The least common instructional support forms included lesson pacing, initial play, and a closure discussion. Students’ simulation use was supported in the fewest ways during a rotating station structure. Results suggest that simulation professional development with elementary teachers needs to explicitly focus on implementation structures and instructional support to enhance participants’ pedagogical knowledge and improve instructional simulation use. In addition, research is needed to provide theoretical explanations for the observed patterns that should subsequently be addressed in supporting teachers’ instructional simulation use during professional development or in teacher preparation programs.

[1]  Rebecca Schneider,et al.  Science Teacher Learning Progressions , 2011 .

[2]  Michele W. Spitulnik,et al.  Supporting Teachers’ Use of Technology in Science Instruction Through Professional Development: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[3]  Tomi Jaakkola,et al.  A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation‐laboratory contexts , 2011 .

[4]  David F. Treagust,et al.  What do students really learn from interactive multimedia? A physics case study , 2004 .

[5]  W. Baird,et al.  Changes in preservice elementary teachers' hypothesizing skills following group or individual study with computer simulations , 1988 .

[6]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Which Setting to Choose: Comparison of Whole-Class vs. Small-Group Computer Simulation Use , 2014 .

[7]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[8]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools in Science Education: An Emerging Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Practice. , 2007 .

[9]  Gillian Smith,et al.  Affordances and Constraints of Computers in Science Education , 1996 .

[10]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[11]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Computer literacy and inquiry learning: when geeks learn less , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Research Article Concurrent Enrollment in Lecture and Laboratory Enhances Student Performance and Retention , 2012 .

[13]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers , 2007 .

[14]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .

[15]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Emerging teacher strategies for mediating ‘Technology-integrated Instructional Conversations’: a socio-cultural perspective , 2005 .

[16]  Gregory W. Corder,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach , 2009 .

[17]  M. Windschitl.  Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers , 2002 .

[18]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[20]  S. Selcen Guzey,et al.  Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) , 2009 .

[21]  James Jaccard,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[22]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Preservice teachers' theory development in physical and simulated environments , 2006 .

[23]  M. Linn,et al.  Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations , 2013 .

[24]  Wendy K. Adams,et al.  Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations , 2010 .

[25]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .

[26]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[27]  Libby F. Gerard,et al.  Principal Leadership for Technology-enhanced Learning in Science , 2008 .

[28]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/ animation on learning electrochemistry , 2003 .

[29]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software , 2000 .

[30]  Carla Meskill,et al.  EXPERT AND NOVICE TEACHERS TALKING TECHNOLOGY: PRECEPTS, CONCEPTS, AND MISCONCEPTS , 2002 .

[31]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[32]  Miky Ronen,et al.  Simulation - a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[34]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  Transforming Students' Inquiry Skills with Computer-Based Simulations , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[35]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations , 2010 .

[36]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[37]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[38]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Impacts and Characteristics of Computer-Based Science Inquiry Learning Environments for Precollege Students , 2014 .

[39]  Bekele Gashe Dega,et al.  Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict , 2013 .

[40]  Michele W. Spitulnik,et al.  Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science Instruction. , 2010 .

[41]  William L. Romine,et al.  Game-Based Curricula in Biology Classes: Differential Effects among Varying Academic Levels , 2013 .

[42]  Denise Jaques Jones.  The Station Approach: How to Teach with Limited Resources , 2007 .

[43]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[44]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[45]  R. Moreno.  Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia , 2004 .

[46]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching , 2006 .

[47]  Robert H. Rivers,et al.  Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving , 1987 .

[48]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[49]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Fred Paas,et al.  Instructional efficiency of animation: effects of interactivity through mental reconstruction of static key frames , 2007 .

[51]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students' Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis? , 2012 .

[52]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[53]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Connected Chemistry—Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom , 2003 .

[54]  Kara Dawson,et al.  Conditions, processes and consequences of technology use: a case study , 2004 .

[55]  Melissa J. Luna,et al.  Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing , 2013 .

[56]  Constaninos P. Constantinou,et al.  An Investigation of the Potential of Interactive Simulations for Developing System Thinking Skills in Elementary School: A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders , 2009 .

[57]  M. Miles,et al.  Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft , 1984 .

[58]  E. Soloway,et al.  Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities , 1996 .

[59]  Yan Wang,et al.  Research Article Investigating the Effectiveness of Computer Simulations for Chemistry Learning , 2012 .

[60]  M. Linn,et al.  Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters , 2011 .

[61]  Sam Reid,et al.  A Study of Educational Simulations Part 1 - Engagement and Learning , 2008 .

[62]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[63]  Tomi Jaakkola,et al.  Fostering elementary school students' understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[64]  Michelle Williams,et al.  Moving Technology to the Center of Instruction: How One Experienced Teacher Incorporates a Web-based Environment Over Time , 2008 .

[65]  Koun-Tem Sun,et al.  A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[66]  David W. Brooks,et al.  A Comparison of Inquiry and Worked Example Web-Based Instruction Using Physlets , 2004 .

[67]  Nadira Saab,et al.  Communication in collaborative discovery learning. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[68]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature , 2012 .

[69]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[70]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[71]  Ying-Shao Hsu,et al.  Learning about seasons in a technologically enhanced environment: The impact of teacher-guided and student-centered instructional approaches on the process of students' conceptual change , 2008 .

[72]  Noah S. Podolefsky.  Learning science through computer games and simulations , 2012 .

[73]  F. Paas,et al.  Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation , 2011 .

[74]  Susan Pedersen,et al.  Advancing young adolescents' hypothesis-development performance in a computer-supported and problem-based learning environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[75]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Images of Expertise in Mathematics Teaching , 2011 .

[76]  G. Roehrig,et al.  Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge , 2009 .

[77]  Cedric Linder,et al.  Equipment issues regarding the collection of video data for research. , 2005 .

[78]  Mwangi Ndirangu,et al.  Effectiveness of a Computer-Mediated Simulations Program in School Biology on Pupils' Learning Outcomes in Cell Theory , 2004 .

[79]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations , 2010 .

[80]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[81]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[82]  J. Brownlee,et al.  Elementary Teacher’s Conceptions of Inquiry Teaching: Messages for Teacher Development , 2012 .