Perspectives on transportation issues: The importance of having physically fit cattle and pigs

One of the most important issues is starting with an animal that is fit for transport. It is impossible to assure good animal welfare during trans- port if the animal is unfit. Severely lame or weak, emaci- ated animals are not fit for transport. Recent figures on the incidence of nonambulatory cull dairy cows show that the problem has become worse since 1993. In beef cattle there has been a slight improvement. A major factor causing unfitness in some cows and pigs is over- selection for milk or meat production. Lameness may be increasing in some high-producing dairy cows and sows. Modern hybrid pigs, which have been selected for rapid growth, leanness, and a large loin area, are often prone to stress that causes the pig to become nonambu- latory. Observations at packing plants indicate that in certain genetic lines the incidence of transit deads and

[1]  T. Grandin Farm animal welfare during handling, transport, and slaughter. , 1994, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[2]  T Grandin,et al.  Assessment of stress during handling and transport. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[3]  J. Apple,et al.  Influence of body condition score on by-product yield and value from cull beef cows. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[4]  V. Wiegant,et al.  Effects of regular moving and handling on the behavioral and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for subsequent meat quality. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[5]  T. Grandin,et al.  Euthanasia and slaughter of livestock. , 1994, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[6]  Timothy Loula Increasing sow longevity: The role of people and management , 2000 .

[7]  T. Grandin,et al.  Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants. , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  K. Bondari,et al.  Effects of bovine somatotropin on milk yield and composition, body weight, and condition score of Holstein and Jersey cows. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  H. Erb,et al.  Relationship of changes in condition score to cow health in Holsteins. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  T. Grandin Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices. , 2000, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[11]  L. Hansen,et al.  Response of health care to selection for milk yield of dairy cattle. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[13]  J. Goff,et al.  Strategies for preventing milk fever in dairy cattle. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R. Robinson,et al.  Prevalence and severity of lameness in lactating dairy cows in a sample of Minnesota and Wisconsin herds. , 1993, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[15]  J J Vermunt,et al.  Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors , 1991, Veterinary Record.

[16]  L D Warnick,et al.  Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in dairy cattle. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  T Grandin,et al.  Handling methods and facilities to reduce stress on cattle. , 1998, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[18]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  National market cow and bull beef quality audit-1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[19]  Terry L. Whiting,et al.  Livestock Handling and Transport, 2nd ed , 2001 .

[20]  Y. Gröhn,et al.  The association between previous 305-day milk yield and disease in New York State dairy cows. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  D. Jordan,et al.  Effects of recombinant methionyl bovine somatotropin (sometribove) in high producing cows milked three times daily. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  E. J. Hunter,et al.  Pig welfare and carcase quality: a comparison of the influence of slaughter handling systems at two abattoirs , 1994, Veterinary Record.

[23]  P. Greenough,et al.  Sole haemorrhages in dairy heifers managed under different underfoot and environmental conditions. , 1996, The British veterinary journal.

[24]  H. Erb,et al.  Risk factors for downer cow syndrome. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  R. Robinson,et al.  Some risk factors associated with clinical lameness in dairy herds in Minnesota and Wisconsin , 1995, Veterinary Record.

[26]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Genetic parameters of health disorders, and relationships with 305-day milk yield and conformation traits of registered Holstein cows. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  L. J. Boyd,et al.  Review: Reducing Handling Stress Improves Both Productivity and Welfare , 1998 .