论文信息 - Crossing Coreference in Discourse Representation Theory

Crossing Coreference in Discourse Representation Theory

Sentences with crossing coreference (Bach-Peters-sentences) are notoriously difficult to explain in a natural manner. An intriguing parallel with certain properties of Prolog suggests a modification to Discourse Representation Theory which allows a simple and coherent explanation of these, and related, sentences.

Michael Hess | Michael Hess

[1] James D. McCawley,et al. Where do noun phrases come from , 1969 .

[2] Bonnie Webber,et al. So what can we talk about now , 1986 .

[3] Rebecca Louise Root,et al. The semantics of anaphora in discourse , 1986 .

[4] Roderick A. Jacobs,et al. Readings in English transformational grammar , 1970 .

[5] Michael Brady,et al. Computational Models of Discourse , 1983 .

[6] Wolfgang Schönfeld,et al. A Theory for the Representation of Knowledge , 1986, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[7] Hubert Lehmann,et al. Rules for Pronominalization , 1983, EACL.

[8] Norman Macleod,et al. More on backward anaphora and discourse structure , 1984 .

[9] Guy Carden,et al. Backwards anaphora in discourse context , 1982, Journal of Linguistics.

[10] Manfred Pinkal. Situationssemantic und Diskursrepräsentationstheorie: Einordnung und Anwendungsaspekte , 1985, GWAI.