Is the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status a valid alternative in persons who cannot be evaluated by the Mini Mental State Examination?

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), a widely used tool for first-line assessment of cognitive function, cannot be fully administered to persons with severe visual or upper extremity impairments. This cross-sectional study, which was performed in a sample of patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of the INRCA Geriatric Department “I Fraticini” (Firenze, Italy) and their relatives, evaluated whether the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), a test originally created for telephone screening of cognitive impairment, is a valid alternative for assessment of cognition in persons who cannot provide valid responses to all the MMSE items. Fifteen subjects in each of seven MMSE strata (9–11, 12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, 24–26, 27–30) were consecutively selected. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥60 years; Italian as the main language; education ≥3 years; medical stability; and ability to complete the MMSE. At admission, participants were examined for dementia by an expert clinician according to the DSM IV criteria. Italian versions of the TICS and the MMSE were administered face-to-face by two trained interviewers. The TICS was readministered face-to-face one week later by the same interviewer that had previously administered the test. The TICS showed good test-retest reproducibility. Assessments taken one week apart differed on average by 0.52±1.9 points (p<0.01), indicating a systematic improvement. The TICS explained 96% of the variance in the MMSE, and this association was independent of age, gender and education. More than 90% of the cases “screening positive” (i.e., scoring below a certain cut-off) by the TICS, were also identified as “screening positive” when comparable MMSE cut-off scores were used. Using comparable cut-off scores, the sensitivity and specificity of TICS and MMSE in detecting a standard clinical diagnosis of dementia largely overlapped. In persons who cannot be evaluated with the MMSE in its full form, the face-to-face administration of the TICS is a reliable and valid alternative.

[1]  R. Mohs,et al.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). , 1995, Neurology.

[2]  A. Monsch,et al.  Improving the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini‐Mental State Examination , 1995, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[3]  F. Boller,et al.  Severe impairment battery. A neuropsychological test for severely demented patients. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[4]  P. Sloane,et al.  Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  M. Folstein,et al.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. , 1993, JAMA.

[6]  E B Larson,et al.  The Mini-Mental State Examination score and the clinical diagnosis of dementia. , 1994, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

[7]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  The Longitudinal Stability of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[8]  Marshal F. Folstein,et al.  The telephone interview for cognitive status , 1988 .

[9]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Prevalence of dementia and probable senile dementia of the Alzheimer type in the Framingham Study , 1992, Neurology.

[10]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[11]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[12]  L. Thal,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of dementia of the Alzheimer type , 1990, Neurology.

[13]  K. Holmen,et al.  Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in an elderly urban population , 1991, Neurology.

[14]  J. Lindeboom,et al.  Relation between education and dementia: the role of test bias revisited. , 1995, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[15]  J. Lindeboom,et al.  Are age and education independent correlates of the Mini-Mental State Exam performance of community-dwelling elderly? , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[16]  J. Anthony,et al.  Using the "Mini-Mental State" examination to predict elderly subjects' completion of a follow-up interview. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  T. Tatemichi,et al.  The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS): Reliability and validity in a stroke sample , 1994 .

[19]  W. Rocca,et al.  Prevalence of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease and other dementing disorders , 1990, Neurology.

[20]  J. Lave,et al.  Evaluation of Outpatient Geriatric Assessment: A Randomized Multi‐site Trial , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  B. Reed,et al.  Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly , 1996, Neurology.