Distribution and Variability of Surface Soil Properties at a Regional Scale

Information on the probability distribution and variability of soil properties at a regional scale could improve the ability of the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to monitor soil condition using the National Resources Inventory (NRI). Our objective was to evaluate the hypothesis that the probability distribution of 17 physical, chemical, and biological soil properties are: (i) normally distributed, or (ii) log-normally distributed at a regional scale, and to estimate the magnitude of change that may be detected assuming either a normal or log-normal distribution. Samples were collected irrespective of soil series from two Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs) (no. 9 and 105), and from the Ascalon (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Argiustoll) and Amarillo (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, thermie Aridic Paleustalf) soils in MLRA 67 and 77, using the NRI sampling design. Most soil properties were non-normally distributed, with the frequency of non-normality varying between MLRAs. Confining sampling to a single soil series did not consistently improve the precision with which soil properties were estimated. Log e transformation resulted in normal distributions for most soil properties and reduced variability two- to threefold. However, a few soil properties remained non-normally distributed. Soil pH may be monitored at the regional scale with a high degree of precision. Small changes in soil C content (3-8% of the regional mean) may be detected using log, transformed total organic C as the indicator. Sampling soil properties as part of the NRI should improve NRCS' ability to monitor soil condition on a regional scale.

[1]  A. Konopka,et al.  FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS , 1994 .

[2]  R. David Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Central Tendency and Variance of Soil Properties within Map Units , 1998 .

[3]  W. D. Nettleton,et al.  Variability of measured properties in morphologically matched pedons. , 1980 .

[4]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .

[5]  Wayne A. Fuller,et al.  DESIGN AND ESTIMATION FOR INVESTIGATING THE DYNAMICS OF NATURAL RESOURCES , 1998 .

[6]  T. Parkin,et al.  Analysis of Lognormal Data , 1992 .

[7]  R. Protz,et al.  Estimating Earthworm-Influenced Soil Structure by Morphometric Image Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  W. D. Kemper,et al.  Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[9]  J. Meisinger,et al.  Sample Size Consideration in the Determination of Soil Nitrate , 1992 .

[10]  F. Young,et al.  Frequency Distributions of Soil Properties on a Loess-mantled Missouri Watershed , 1999 .

[11]  Daniel Hillel RESEARCH IN SOIL PHYSICS: A RE‐VIEW , 1991 .

[12]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[13]  Robert L. Kellogg,et al.  Highlights from the 1992 national resources inventory , 1994 .

[14]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality , 1990 .

[15]  J. Meisinger,et al.  Influence of Sample Size on Chemical and Physical Soil Measurements , 1995 .

[16]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[17]  G. Sparling,et al.  A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C: calibration in situ using microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells , 1988 .

[18]  A. Mehlich Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant , 1984 .

[19]  T. Parkin,et al.  Spatial Variability of Microbial Processes in Soil—A Review , 1993 .

[20]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[21]  J. Meisinger,et al.  Evaluation of statistical estimation methods for lognormally distributed variables , 1988 .

[22]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  D. J. Ross,et al.  A DIRECT EXTRACTION METHOD TO ESTIMATE SOIL MICROBIAL C: EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLES AND SOME DIFFERENT CALIBRATION PROCEDURES , 1988 .

[24]  M. Seyfried,et al.  Scale and the Nature of Spatial Variability: Field Examples Having Implications for Hydrologic Modeling , 1995 .