Medications versus cognitive behavior therapy for severely depressed outpatients: mega-analysis of four randomized comparisons.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the acute outcomes of antidepressant medication and cognitive behavior therapy in the severely depressed outpatient subgroups of four major randomized trials. A secondary objective was to compare the results obtained in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program, upon which treatment guidelines have been based, with those obtained in the other three studies. METHOD Outcomes of antidepressant medication and cognitive behavior therapy were compared within each of the four studies separately and for patients aggregated across the four studies. In addition, the outcomes in the antidepressant medication and cognitive behavior therapy conditions of the Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program were compared with those obtained in the other three studies. RESULTS The overall effect sizes comparing antidepressant medication to cognitive behavior therapy favored cognitive behavior therapy, but tests comparing the two modalities did not reveal a significant advantage for either modality overall. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive behavior therapy has fared as well as antidepressant medication with severely depressed outpatients in four major comparisons. Until findings emerge from current or future comparative trials, antidepressant medication should not be considered, on the basis of empirical evidence, to be superior to cognitive behavior therapy for the acute treatment of severely depressed outpatients.

[1]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. , 1967, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[2]  J. Feighner,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. , 1972, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  E. Robins,et al.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  D. Klein,et al.  Efficacy of desipramine in depressed outpatients. Response according to research diagnosis criteria diagnoses and severity of illness. , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  A. Simons,et al.  Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy. Singly and together in the treatment of depression. , 1984, Archives of general psychiatry.

[6]  Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy , 1984 .

[7]  E. Paykel,et al.  Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trial. , 1988, Journal of affective disorders.

[8]  S D Imber,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments. , 1989, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  K. Dobson.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression. , 1989, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  W M Grove,et al.  Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Singly and in combination. , 1992, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  A. Hayes,et al.  An appraisal of cognitive therapy. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  W. E. Craighead,et al.  The Role of Nonspecific Factors in Cognitive‐Behavior Therapy for Depression , 1994 .

[14]  D. Hedeker,et al.  Initial severity and differential treatment outcome in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. , 1995, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

[15]  I Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies. , 1995, Statistics in Medicine.

[16]  Psychotherapy for depression: no stronger medicine. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[17]  A. Rush,et al.  The role of psychotherapy in the treatment of depression: review of two practice guidelines. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  S. Hollon,et al.  Cognitive-behavior therapy versus pharmacotherapy: Now that the jury's returned its verdict, it's time to present the rest of the evidence. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  D. Klein.  Preventing hung juries about therapy studies. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  S. Hollon,et al.  Prospects for future comparisons between drugs and psychotherapy: lessons from the CBT-versus-pharmacotherapy exchange. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Science is not a trial (but it can sometimes be a tribulation) , 1996 .

[22]  I Olkin,et al.  Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Views from funding agencies. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1998, Medical care.