Stochastic analysis of user-centric network MIMO

This paper provides an analytical performance characterization of user-centric cooperation for network multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, where base-stations (BSs) form finite-sized clusters to jointly transmit information to and receive information from multiple mobile users. In the user-centric model, the cooperation BS cluster for each user is formed individually and may overlap with each other. The size of clusters determines the amount of backhaul and channel state information needed for implementation. The BSs are equipped with multiple antennas; multiple single-antenna users are served simultaneously; the cooperating BSs perform zero-forcing beamforming across the cluster. By using a stochastic geometry model where the BSs and the users form Poisson point processes over the two-dimensional plane and by further approximating both the signal and interference powers using Gamma distributions of appropriate parameters, this paper shows that, network MIMO provides sum-rate gain for both uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) transmission as compared to single-cell processing. The sum-rate gain is about 30%-60% for a cluster size of 10 and is larger in DL than UL in a typical deployment due to the larger DL transmit power. More significantly, network MIMO can provide 300% gain or more for cluster-edge users, but only for the DL and only with user-centric clustering. This highlights the conclusion that performance evaluation for network MIMO should focus on DL cluster-edge users and on the user-centric clustering strategy.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Multiuser MIMO in Distributed Antenna Systems With Out-of-Cell Interference , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Chris T. K. Ng,et al.  Linear Precoding in Cooperative MIMO Cellular Networks with Limited Coordination Clusters , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Ari Hottinen,et al.  Increasing downlink cellular throughput with limited network MIMO coordination , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Wei Yu,et al.  Sparse Beamforming and User-Centric Clustering for Downlink Cloud Radio Access Network , 2014, IEEE Access.

[6]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Adaptive Multicell 3-D Beamforming in Multiantenna Cellular Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Reinaldo A. Valenzuela,et al.  Network coordination for spectrally efficient communications in cellular systems , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Adaptive Multicell 3D Beamforming in Multi-Antenna Cellular Networks , 2014 .

[9]  David Gesbert,et al.  A Dynamic Clustering Approach in Wireless Networks with Multi-Cell Cooperative Processing , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[10]  Wei Yu,et al.  Downlink Spectral Efficiency of Distributed Antenna Systems Under a Stochastic Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Wei Yu,et al.  Multi-Cell MIMO Cooperative Networks: A New Look at Interference , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Antonia Maria Tulino,et al.  Network MIMO With Linear Zero-Forcing Beamforming: Large System Analysis, Impact of Channel Estimation, and Reduced-Complexity Scheduling , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Uplink Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Di Su,et al.  User-Centric Downlink Cooperative Transmission With Orthogonal Beamforming Based Limited Feedback , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Wei Yu,et al.  A Stochastic Analysis of Network MIMO Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.