Uncertainty in Prognostics and Systems Health Management

This paper presents an overview of various aspects of uncertainty quantification and management in prognostics and systems health management. Prognostics deals with predicting possible future failures in different types of engineering systems. It is almost practically impossible to precisely predict future events; therefore, it is necessary to account for the different sources of uncertainty that affect prognostics, and develop a systematic framework for uncertainty quantification and management in this context. Researchers have developed computational methods for prognostics, both in the context of testing-based health management and condition-based health management. This paper explains that the interpretation of uncertainty for these two different types of situations is completely different. While both the frequentist (based on the presence of true variability) and Bayesian (based on subjective assessment) approaches are applicable in the context of testing-based health management, only the Bayesian approach is applicable in the context of condition-based health management. This paper illustrates that the computation of the remaining useful life is more meaningful in the context of condition-based monitoring and needs to be approached as an uncertainty propagation problem. Further, uncertainty management issues are discussed and possible solutions are explored. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the various concepts discussed in the paper.

[1]  D. C. Swanson,et al.  A general prognostic tracking algorithm for predictive maintenance , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[2]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Performance Evaluation for Fleet-based and Unit-based Prognostic Methods , 2014 .

[3]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  MEASURES OF STRUCTURAL SAFETY UNDER IMPERFECT STATES OF KNOWLEDGE , 1989 .

[4]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[5]  P. E. James T. P. Yao,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design , 2001 .

[6]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  J. Celaya,et al.  Uncertainty Representation and Interpretation in Model-Based Prognostics Algorithms Based on Kalman Filter Estimation , 2012 .

[8]  Wei-Liem Loh On Latin hypercube sampling , 1996 .

[9]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods , 2016 .

[11]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Model-Based Prognostics With Concurrent Damage Progression Processes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[12]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Uncertainty in prognostics: Computational methods and practical challenges , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[13]  Kai Goebel,et al.  A Novel Computational Methodology for Uncertainty Quantification in Prognostics Using The Most Probable Point Concept , 2013 .

[14]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction of Damage Growth Properties Using Structural Health Monitoring , 2010 .

[16]  Shankar Sankararaman,et al.  Significance, interpretation, and quantification of uncertainty in prognostics and remaining useful life prediction , 2015 .

[17]  G. Kacprzynski,et al.  Advances in uncertainty representation and management for particle filtering applied to prognostics , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[18]  Abhinav Saxena,et al.  - 1-A COMPARISON OF THREE DATA-DRIVEN TECHNIQUES FOR PROGNOSTICS , 2008 .

[19]  Huairui Guo,et al.  Predicting remaining useful life of an individual unit using proportional hazards model and logistic regression model , 2006, RAMS '06. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006..

[20]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Why is the Remaining Useful Life Prediction Uncertain , 2013 .

[21]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[22]  Hugh McManus,et al.  A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[23]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  First-order concepts in system reliability , 1982 .

[24]  Jie Gu,et al.  Uncertainty Assessment of Prognostics of Electronics Subject to Random Vibration , 2007, AAAI Fall Symposium: Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics.

[25]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Uncertainty in Prognostics and Health Management : An Overview , 2014 .

[26]  S Sankararaman,et al.  Likelihood-based representation of imprecision due to sparse point data and/or interval data , 2011 .

[27]  K. Doliński,et al.  First-order second-moment approximation in reliability of structural systems: Critical review and alternative approach , 1982 .

[28]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  James R. Van Zandt A more robust unscented transform , 2001 .

[30]  Bryan E. Shepherd,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer by SALTELLI, A., RATTO, M., ANDRES, T., CAMPOLONGO, F., CARIBONI, J., GATELLI, D., SAISANA, M., and TARANTOLA, S , 2009 .

[31]  Distribution type uncertainty due to sparse and imprecise data , 2013 .

[32]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognosis: An Uncertainty Propagation Problem , 2013 .

[33]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using First-Order Reliability Methods , 2014, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[34]  Donald L. Iglehart,et al.  Importance sampling for stochastic simulations , 1989 .

[35]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Are Current Prognostic Performance Evaluation Practices Sufficient and Meaningful? , 2014 .

[36]  Chetan S. Kulkarni,et al.  Physics Based Electrolytic Capacitor Degradation Models for Prognostic Studies under Thermal Overstress , 2012 .

[37]  C. Bucher Adaptive sampling — an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure , 1988 .

[38]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Damage Propagation Modeling for Aircraft Engine Prognostics , 2008 .

[39]  George Vachtsevanos,et al.  Methodologies for uncertainty management in prognostics , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.