Analytic and Experimental Investigation of Dihedral Configurations of Three-Winglet Planforms

An analytic and experimental effort was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of three winglets mounted chordwise to the tip of a rectangular wing. The winglets, with an aspect ratio of 4.6, were mounted on a half-span wing having an effective aspect ratio of 6.29. 13 configurations of varying dihedral arrangements were analyzed with a vortex lattice method and tested in a low-speed wind tunnel at a Reynolds number of 600,000. While the analytic method provided fair agreement with the experimental results, the predicted trends in lift, drag, and (to a lesser degree) pitching moment were in good agreement. The analytic distributions of wake velocity, circulation, and downwash angle verified that highly nonplanar configurations tended to reduce and diffuse the regions of highest circulation and to create more moderate downwash angles in the wake. This was manifest as an overall drag reduction. More specifically, the results showed that the winglets could be placed in various optimum orientations to increase the lift coefficient as much as 65% at the same angle of attack, decrease the drag coefficient as much as 54% at the same lift coefficient, or improve the maximum L/D by up to 57%. The most dramatic findings from this study show that positioning the winglet dihedral angles had the result of adjusting the magnitude and slope of the pitching moment coefficient. These observations suggest that multiple winglet dihedral variations may be feasible for use as actively controlled surfaces to improve the performance of aircraft at various flight conditions and to "tune" the longitudinal stability characteristics of the configuration.

[1]  W. G. Steele,et al.  Engineering application of experimental uncertainty analysis , 1995 .

[2]  Ludwig Prandtl,et al.  Applications of Modern Hydrodynamics to Aeronautics , 1923 .

[3]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data , 1959 .

[4]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[5]  O Samoylovitch,et al.  Determination of the Oswald efficiency factor at the aeroplane design preliminary stage , 2000 .

[6]  Tucker.  Drag reduction by wing tip slots in a gliding Harris' hawk, Parabuteo unicinctus , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Laurens E. Howle,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Sinusoidal Leading Edges , 2007 .

[8]  Richard T. Whitcomb,et al.  A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets , 1976 .

[9]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results , 1988 .

[10]  Mark D. Maughmer,et al.  THE DESIGN OF WINGLETS FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE SAILPLANES , 2003 .

[11]  C. D. Cone,et al.  The Aerodynamic Design of Wings with Cambered Span Having Minimum Induced Drag , 1963 .

[12]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Highly nonplanar lifting systems , 1996 .

[13]  R. J. Margason,et al.  Vortex-lattice FORTRAN program for estimating subsonic aerodynamic characteristics of complex planforms , 1971 .

[14]  Narayanan Komerath,et al.  Performance Analysis of a Wing With Multiple Winglets , 2001 .

[15]  Mark D. Maughmer,et al.  SAILPLANE WINGLET DESIGN , 1998 .

[16]  Jean-Jacques Chattot.  Low Speed Design and Analysis of Wing/Winglet Combinations Including Viscous Effects , 2006 .

[17]  J. J. Spillman,et al.  Wing tip sails which give lower drag at all normal flight speeds , 1984, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[18]  Max M Munk,et al.  The Minimum Induced Drag of Aerofoils , 1979 .