Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design under Uncertainty

Sensitivity analysis (SA) is an important procedure in engineering design to obtain valuable information about the model behavior to guide a design process. For design under uncertainty, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) methods have been developed to provide insight into the probabilistic behavior of a model. In this paper, the goals of PSA at different design stages are investigated. In the prior-design stage, PSA can be utilized to identify those probabilistically non-significant variables and reduce the dimension of a random design space. It can reduce the computational cost associated with uncertainty assessment without much sacrifice on the optimum solution. For post-design analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis can be used to identify where to spend design resources for the largest potential improvement of a performance. Based on the interested distribution range of a random response, the PSA methods can be categorized into two types: the global response probabilistic sensitivity analysis (GRPSA) and the regional response probabilistic sensitivity analysis (RRPSA). Four widely-used PSA methods: Sobol' indices, Wu's sensitivity coefficients, the MPP based sensitivity coefficients, and the Kullback-Leibler entropy based method are selected for comparison. The merits behind each method are reviewed in details. Their advantages, limitations, and applicability are investigated. Their effectiveness and applicability under different design scenarios are compared in two numerical examples and two engineering design problems.

[1]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  CDF sensitivity analysis technique for ranking influential parameters in the performance assessment of the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  H. Heyer,et al.  Information and Sufficiency , 1982 .

[3]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[4]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Method for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Commercial Aircraft Engines , 1999 .

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[6]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[7]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[8]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[9]  J. Golinski,et al.  An adaptive optimization system applied to machine synthesis , 1973 .

[10]  A. Sudjianto,et al.  First-order saddlepoint approximation for reliability analysis , 2004 .

[11]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Most Probable Point-Based Method for Efficient Uncertainty Analysis , 2001 .

[13]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[14]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models , 1999 .

[15]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[16]  Joseph A. C. Delaney Sensitivity analysis , 2018, The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects.

[17]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[18]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  Ehsan S. Soofi,et al.  A Framework for Measuring the Importance of Variables with Applications to Management Research and Decision Models , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[20]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Forecasting Manufacturing Quality and Optimizing Product Robustness Using Process Capability Data , 2003 .

[21]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[22]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Relative entropy based method for global and regional sensitivity analysis in probabilistic design , 2004, DAC 2004.

[23]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB , 2001 .

[24]  Ruichen Jin,et al.  Analytical Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation-Based Design Under Uncertainty , 2005, DAC 2004.

[25]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[26]  R Rackwitz Structural Reliability — Analysis and Prediction , 2001 .