Improving the robustness of infant lexical processing speed measures

Visual reaction times to target pictures after naming events are an informative measurement in language acquisition research, because gaze shifts measured in looking-while-listening paradigms are an indicator of infants’ lexical speed of processing. This measure is very useful, as it can be applied from a young age onwards and has been linked to later language development. However, to obtain valid reaction times, the infant is required to switch the fixation of their eyes from a distractor to a target object. This means that usually at least half the trials have to be discarded—those where the participant is already fixating the target at the onset of the target word—so that no reaction time can be measured. With few trials, reliability suffers, which is especially problematic when studying individual differences. In order to solve this problem, we developed a gaze-triggered looking-while-listening paradigm. The trials do not differ from the original paradigm apart from the fact that the target object is chosen depending on the infant’s eye fixation before naming. The object the infant is looking at becomes the distractor and the other object is used as the target, requiring a fixation switch, and thus providing a reaction time. We tested our paradigm with forty-three 18-month-old infants, comparing the results to those from the original paradigm. The Gaze-triggered paradigm yielded more valid reaction time trials, as anticipated. The results of a ranked correlation between the conditions confirmed that the manipulated paradigm measures the same concept as the original paradigm.

[1]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  The development of children's ability to track and predict turn structure in conversation , 2017 .

[2]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Talking to Children Matters , 2013, Psychological science.

[3]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. , 2008, Developmental science.

[4]  Jill Lany,et al.  Infants’ Lexical Processing Efficiency is Related to Vocabulary Size by One Year of Age , 2018 .

[5]  D. Swingley,et al.  At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  V. Marchman,et al.  Spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language , 2007, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[8]  John P. Pinto,et al.  Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months , 1999, Cognition.

[9]  Christina Bergmann,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Infants' Mispronunciation Sensitivity Development , 2018, CogSci.

[10]  Obi Amadi,et al.  Picking up speed. , 2010, Community practitioner : the journal of the Community Practitioners' & Health Visitors' Association.

[11]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference , 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[12]  K. Byers‐Heinlein.  The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing: Methods for studying infant bilingualism , 2015 .

[13]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  Reshaping Data with the reshape Package , 2007 .

[14]  Jill Lany.  Lexical-processing efficiency leverages novel word learning in infants and toddlers. , 2018, Developmental science.

[15]  THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFANTS. , 1929, Science.

[16]  C. Bergmann,et al.  The development of infants' responses to mispronunciations: A meta-analysis. , 2019, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Katherine A. Adams,et al.  Predictors of early vocabulary growth in children born preterm and full term: A study of processing speed and medical complications , 2019, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[18]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Input matters: Speed of word recognition in 2-year-olds exposed to multiple accents. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  E. Kidd,et al.  Individual differences in lexical processing efficiency and vocabulary in toddlers: A longitudinal investigation. , 2020, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  Amy Perfors,et al.  Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[23]  R. Sperber,et al.  Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing , 1979 .

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[25]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference , 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[26]  Anne Fernald,et al.  SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. , 2013, Developmental science.

[27]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Names in frames: infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation. , 2006, Developmental science.

[28]  Daniel Swingley,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[29]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[30]  J. Edwards,et al.  Effects of Vocabulary Size on Online Lexical Processing by Preschoolers , 2015, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[31]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A performance model for early word learning , 2016, CogSci.

[32]  Katharine Graf Estes,et al.  Infant statistical-learning ability is related to real-time language processing* , 2017, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  R. Aslin,et al.  Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children , 2000, Cognition.

[34]  R. McKevitt.  Talking with children. , 1970, Journal of the New York State School Nurse-Teachers Association.

[35]  V. Marchman,et al.  Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. , 2008, Developmental science.

[36]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically developing and late-talking toddlers. , 2012, Child development.

[37]  John P. Pinto,et al.  When half a word is enough: infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. , 2001, Child development.

[38]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[39]  John P. Pinto,et al.  Rapid Gains in Speed of Verbal Processing by Infants in the 2nd Year , 1998 .

[40]  Inge Zink,et al.  N-CDIs: Lijsten voor Communicatieve Ontwikkeling , 2002 .

[41]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Dynamics of Word Comprehension in Infancy: Developments in Timing, Accuracy, and Resistance to Acoustic Degradation , 2005, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[42]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. , 2008 .

[43]  R. Aslin,et al.  Lexical Neighborhoods and the Word-Form Representations of 14-Month-Olds , 2002, Psychological science.