Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety

Designing for construction safety entails consideration of the safety of construction workers in the design of a project. Research studies have identified the design aspect of projects as being a significant contributing factor to construction site accidents. Designing to eliminate or avoid hazards prior to exposure on the jobsite is also listed as the top priority in the hierarchy of controls common to the safety and health professions. Widespread implementation of the concept in the United States by engineering and architecture firms, however, is lacking due to perceived industry and project barriers. Given its absence from standard design practice, a question arises as to the viability of designing for safety as an intervention in the construction industry. This paper presents a pilot study that was conducted to investigate the practice of addressing construction worker safety when designing a project and to determine the feasibility and practicality of such an intervention. Through interviews of architects and engineers, the study found that a large percentage of design professionals are interested and willing to implement the concept in practice. Among the perceived impacts of implementation, project cost and schedule were mentioned most often along with limitations being placed on design creativity. The results of the pilot study indicate that designing for safety is a viable intervention in construction. The factors that impact the consideration of safety in the design of a project do not entirely prohibit its implementation or make its implementation extremely impractical and therefore not feasible. Additionally, the outcomes of implementation provide sufficient motivation to implement the concept in practice. The paper describes the key changes needed for implementation of the concept in practice which include: a change in designer mindset toward safety; establishment of a motivational force to promote designing for safety; increase designer knowledge of the concept; incorporate construction safety knowledge in the design phase; utilize designers knowledgeable about design-for-safety modifications; make design for safety tools and guidelines available for use and reference; and mitigate designer liability exposure.

[1]  John A. Gambatese SAFETY EMPHASIS IN UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS , 2003 .

[2]  Roscoe B. Hogan,et al.  Occupational safety and health act , 1977 .

[3]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Tool to design for construction worker safety , 1997 .

[4]  Richard J. Coble,et al.  Construction Safety and Health Management , 2000 .

[5]  J. Smallwood The influence of engineering designers on health and safety during construction : : technical paper , 2004 .

[6]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Engineering Mandates Stipulated in OSHA Regulations , 2003 .

[7]  A. Roy Duff,et al.  Development of Causal Model of Construction Accident Causation , 2001 .

[8]  E. Poutsma,et al.  EUROPEAN FOUNDATION for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions , 1999 .

[9]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Role of designers in construction worker safety , 1992 .

[10]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Liability in Designing for Construction Worker Safety , 1998 .

[11]  Liz Bluff Regulating safe design and planning of Construction Works: a review of strategies for regulating OHS in the design and planning of buildings, structures and other construction projects , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Behm Establishing the link between construction fatalities and disabling injuries and the design for construction safety concept , 2004 .

[13]  Jacco M. Hoekstra Designing for Safety , 2001 .

[14]  Steven Hecher,et al.  Making Ergonomic Changes in Construction: Worksite Training and Task Interventions , 2001 .

[15]  Fred A. Manuele,et al.  On the Practice of Safety , 1993 .