The image pyramid system — an unbiased, inexpensive and broadly accessible method of telepathology

Although computerised information technology, including the Internet is broadly used and globally accessible it is still not a significant form of professional communications in diagnostic histopathology. The high cost of interactive dynamic telepathology systems makes their use limited outside the richest economies. In contrast static telepathology systems are relatively cheap but in practice their information content can be heavily biased by the choice of images sent by the consulting pathologist. The degree of this bias may be regarded simply as the amount of information transferred to a remote location expressed as a percentage of the total information present in the histological sample. We refer to this as the percentage of explicit versus implicit information. Another major source of bias may be found in the information transmitted in written or verbal discussion with a remote consultant. We have developed a system of static telepathology, the image pyramid, which attempts to minimise bias by transferring all of the information in a section to the consultant. It is inexpensive and should prove to be widely accessible.

[1]  P W Callas,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of a rural live video telepathology system. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[2]  G Wolf,et al.  Telepathology by the Internet , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  P. Bedossa,et al.  [Reliability of the anatomopathological diagnosis by static image transfer]. , 1995, Archives d'anatomie et de cytologie pathologiques.

[4]  Peter Gombas,et al.  Informational Aspects of Telepathology in Routine Surgical Pathology , 2000, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[5]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services. , 1987, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[6]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Human performance studies of the video microscopy component of a dynamic telepathology system. , 1992, Zentralblatt fur Pathologie.

[7]  R. Weinstein A futurist meets the 21st century: love at first sight. , 2000, Human pathology.

[8]  P. Gombas,et al.  Future aspects and benefits of telematic networks used in pathology for countries of Central Europe (CCE) , 1996 .

[9]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Dynamic-robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study. , 1997, Human pathology.

[10]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of an international static-imaging telepathology consultation service. , 1997, Human pathology.

[11]  H Bastien,et al.  Telepathology: a new tool of pathology? Presentation of a French national network. , 1992, Zentralblatt fur Pathologie.

[12]  E C Klatt,et al.  Web-based pathology education. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  Klaus Kayser,et al.  Telepathology: Telecommunication, Electronic Education and Publication in Pathology , 1999 .

[14]  K Kayser,et al.  Aids of telepathology in intra-operative histomorphological tumor diagnosis and classification. , 1993, In vivo.

[15]  K Kayser,et al.  Basic aspects of and recent developments in telepathology in Europe, with specific emphasis on quality assurance. , 1999, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[16]  Telepathology: assessment of the implications and applications of telepathology for practical diagnostic pathology. , 1998, Journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  J H Saltz Digital pathology--the big picture. , 2000, Human pathology.

[18]  T Mairinger,et al.  Pathologists' attitudes to implementing telepathology , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  F A Allaert,et al.  Telepathology diagnosis by means of digital still images: an international validation study. , 1996, Human pathology.

[20]  E Schubert,et al.  A pathologist-designed imaging system for anatomic pathology signout, teaching, and research. , 1994, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[21]  William Bains,et al.  Artificial Intelligence from A to Z , 1992 .

[22]  C. Poremba,et al.  Ökonomische Evaluation der Telepathologie , 1998, Der Pathologe.

[23]  K. Kayser,et al.  Long distance image transfer: First results of its use in histopathological diagnosis , 1991, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[24]  T J Eide,et al.  Current status of telepathology , 1994, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[25]  R. Bashshur,et al.  Telemedicine effects: Cost, quality, and access , 1995, Journal of Medical Systems.

[26]  T Harris,et al.  Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[27]  F. J. W-M Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists , 2001 .

[28]  C. Sowter,et al.  Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium? , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[29]  K. Cooper,et al.  Identification of HHV8 in early Kaposi's sarcoma: implications for Kaposi's sarcoma pathogenesis. , 1998, Molecular pathology : MP.

[30]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology: a ten-year progress report. , 1997, Human pathology.