Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma.

People with macular scotoma tend to read and visually scan more slowly than others with equivalently reduced visual acuity but intact central fields. We measured fixation eye movements and considered the contribution of fixation variability and centripetal eye drift to poor visual performance. These factors might confound efforts to consistently use an optimum retinal locus outside of the macula. We measured monocular horizontal and vertical eye movements using a search coil eyetracker while subjects with naturally occurring central scotomata or control subjects with simulated scotomata eccentrically fixated a single character that was sized to their visual acuity. Motivated subjects with long-standing stable maculopathies were chosen to estimate attainable performance limits. During attempts to eccentrically fixate, an ubiquitous foveal pursuit or centripetal drift tendency was not found; rather a pattern of drift was idiosyncratic from subject to subject. This finding was confirmed by an analysis of eye drift of 32 eyes with long-standing bilateral macular scotomata. Moreover, the eye drift speeds (15-200 minarc/sec) were too low to be of functional significance. Drift speeds during eccentric fixation with a visible target were not significantly different than those after the target was extinguished; however, drift speeds were greater than during foveal fixation. This suggests that the fovea has a specialized control of slow eye movements. Fixation variability increased with scotoma size for both simulated and real scotomata, with an abrupt rise when scotomata diameters exceeded 20 degrees C. A significant minority of subjects (39%) adopted two or more distinct preferred retinal loci (PRL) during fixation. Multiple PRL were also more likely if scotoma size exceeded 20 degrees C. Reasonably steady fixation is thus attainable when central scotoma sizes are smaller than approximately 20 degrees C.

[1]  R Täumer,et al.  Investigations of the eye tracking system through stabilized retinal images. , 1972, Bibliotheca ophthalmologica : supplementa ad ophthalmologica.

[2]  E Peli,et al.  Latency of peripheral saccades. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Redevelopment of Fixation and Scanning Eye Movements Following the Loss of Foveal Function , 1986 .

[4]  G. K. Noorden,et al.  Phenomenology of eccentric fixation. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  Lawrence E. Arend,et al.  Temporal determinants of the form of the spatial contrast threshold MTF , 1976, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[7]  W. Becker,et al.  Accuracy of saccadic eye movements and maintenance of eccentric eye positions in the dark. , 1973, Vision research.

[8]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[9]  L. Optican,et al.  An Amplitude and Phase Regulating Magnetic Field Generator for an Eye Movement Monitor , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  R. Steinman,et al.  Fixation of targets near the absolute foveal threshold. , 1968, Vision research.

[11]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  F L Ferris,et al.  Senile macular degeneration: review of epidemiologic features. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[14]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[15]  Robert M. Steinman,et al.  The effect of luminance on human smooth pursuit of perifoveal and foveal targets , 1978, Vision Research.

[16]  L. Arend,et al.  Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  R Meissen,et al.  Visual Performance and Reading Capacity of Partially Sighted Persons in a Rehabilitation Center , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[18]  S. Heywood,et al.  Eye movements and the after-image. II. The effect of foveal and non-foveal after-images on saccadic behaviour. , 1972, Vision research.

[19]  J NACHMIAS,et al.  Two-dimensional motion of the retinal image during monocular fixation. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  Bennet-Clark Hc THE OCULOMOTOR RESPONSE TO SMALL TARGET REPLACEMENTS. , 1964 .

[21]  H C BENNET-CLARK THE OCULOMOTOR RESPONSE TO SMALL TARGET REPLACEMENTS. , 1964, Optica acta.

[22]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Contr of eye position in the dark. , 1970, Vision research.

[23]  Gunter K. von Noorden,et al.  Atlas of strabismus , 1973 .

[24]  R M Steinman,et al.  NATURAL RETINAL IMAGE MOTION: ORIGIN AND CHANGE * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[26]  R V Sansbury,et al.  Normal fixation of eccentric targets. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[28]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.