Student-centredness: the link between transforming students and transforming ourselves

It is widely accepted in the higher education literature that a student-centred approach is pedagogically superior to a teacher-centred approach. In this paper, we explore the notion of student-centredness as a threshold concept and the implications this might have for academic staff development. We argue that the term student-centred in the Rogerian sense implies a focus on the person of the student and is deeply resonant with Barnett's assertion that the emergent being of the student is as important as the development of skills and knowledge. To facilitate transformative learning in higher education an academic must know how to value the person of the student in the learning process. Academic staff development initiatives need to work with the person of the academic and take into account the level of personal development required for each academic to be able to facilitate this kind of learning.

[1]  L. Goldstein.  The Relational Zone: The Role of Caring Relationships in the Co-Construction of Mind , 1999 .

[2]  Carl R. Rogers,et al.  Freedom to learn for the 80's , 1982 .

[3]  Kanae Onotani.  Considering the central ideas of the ethics of care in N. Noddings' Caring : A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education , 2012 .

[4]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse , 1996 .

[5]  Sarah J. Mann,et al.  Study, Power and the University , 2008 .

[6]  Jeff Jawitz.  New academics negotiating communities of practice: learning to swim with the big fish , 2007 .

[7]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[8]  C. Rogers.  Becoming a person , 1956 .

[9]  N. Noddings.  Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , 1984 .

[10]  Liisa Postareff,et al.  Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education , 2008 .

[11]  V. Bamber.  Evaluating lecturer development programmes: received wisdom or self‐knowledge? , 2008 .

[12]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[13]  J. Mezirow.  Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[14]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[15]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[16]  R. Barnett.  A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty , 2007 .

[17]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[18]  Constance C. Gerger.  Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. , 1993 .

[19]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Growing and Developing as a University Teacher--Variation in Meaning , 2003 .

[20]  H. King.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge , 2006 .

[21]  R. Morrow,et al.  Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical Pedagogy and Transformative Social Change , 2002 .