Research through the Generations: Reflecting on the Past, Present and Future

The paper provides a reflection on the past and present of research on the use of digital technologies for learning, teaching and research, along with an extrapolation of the future of the field. It considers which technologies have been transformative in the last thirty years or so along with the nature of the transformation and the challenges. Research in the field is grouped into three types: pedagogical, technical and organizational. The emergence and nature of digital learning as a field is considered. Six facets of digital learning, and in particular digital technologies, as a research field are described: the good and the bad of digital technologies, the speed of change, the new forms of discourse and collaboration, the importance of understanding users, the new practices that have emerged, and finally a reflection on the wider impact.  The paper provides a reflection on the past and present of research on the use of digital technologies for learning, teaching and research, along with an extrapolation of the future of the field. It considers which technologies have been transformative in the last thirty years or so along with the nature of the transformation and the challenges. Research in the field is grouped into three types: pedagogical, technical and organizational. The emergence and nature of digital learning as a field is considered. Six facets of digital learning, and in particular digital technologies, as a research field are described: the good and the bad of digital technologies, the speed of change, the new forms of discourse and collaboration, the importance of understanding users, the new practices that have emerged, and finally a reflection on the wider impact.

[1]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[2]  Bill Anderson Contemporary Perspectives in E-Learning Research , 2008 .

[3]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[4]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Learners experiences: how pervasive and integrative tools influence expectations of study , 2010 .

[5]  Yves Punie,et al.  Validation of Non-formal MOOC-based Learning: An Analysis of Assessment and Recognition Practices in Europe (OpenCred) , 2016 .

[6]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[7]  Ron Owston,et al.  The Effects of Word Processing on Students' Writing Quality and Revision Strategies. , 1992 .

[8]  Panagiota Alevizou,et al.  A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education , 2010 .

[9]  G. Conole,et al.  What are the affordances of information and communication technologies ? , 2004 .

[10]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[11]  Steven Interrelationship of Language and Cognitive Development (Overview) , 2014 .

[12]  Don Tapscott,et al.  The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence , 2003 .

[13]  Richard Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse -- A controlled comparison , 1999 .

[14]  D. Perkins Person plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning , 1994 .

[15]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[16]  M. Weller A Pedagogy of Abundance , 2011, The Digital Scholar.

[17]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[18]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: Findings from the TEL Research Programme , 2010 .