A predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.

OBJECTIVES Despite long-term survival benefits, the increased risk of sternal complications limits the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafts for myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was both to analyse the risk factors for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), which complicates routine BITA grafting and to create a DSWI risk score based on the results of this analysis. METHODS BITA grafts were used as skeletonized conduits in 2936 (70.6%) of 4160 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery at the authors' institution from 1 January 1999 to 2013. The outcomes of these BITA patients were reviewed retrospectively and a risk factor analysis for DSWI was performed. RESULTS A total of 129 (4.4%) patients suffered from DSWI. Two multivariable analysis models were created to examine preoperative factors either alone or combined with intraoperative and postoperative factors. Female gender, obesity, diabetes, poor glycaemic control, chronic lung disease and urgent surgical priority were the predictors of DSWI common to both models. Two (preoperative and combined) models of a new scoring system were devised to predict DSWI after BITA grafting. The preoperative model performed better than five of six scoring systems for sternal wound infection that were considered; the combined model performed better than three considered scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS A weighted scoring system based on risk factors for DSWI was specifically created to predict DSWI risk after BITA grafting. This scoring system outperformed the existing scoring systems for sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery. Prospective studies are needed for validation.

[1]  G. Sinagra,et al.  Routine use of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts for left-sided myocardial revascularization in insulin-dependent diabetic patients: early and long-term outcomes. , 2015, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  M. Sá,et al.  Patency of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary bypass graft surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[4]  B. Medalion,et al.  Long-term outcomes of patients with diabetes receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  P. Erwin,et al.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  P. Kurlansky,et al.  Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting Enhances Survival in Diabetic Patients: A 30-Year Follow-Up of Propensity Score–Matched Cohorts , 2012, Circulation.

[7]  M. Ruel,et al.  Use of bilateral internal thoracic artery during coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: The bilateral internal thoracic artery survey. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  A. Buja,et al.  An update review on risk factors and scales for prediction of deep sternal wound infections , 2012, International wound journal.

[9]  Samer A M Nashef,et al.  EuroSCORE II. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  M. Bland,et al.  Risk factors and mortality associated with deep sternal wound infections following coronary bypass surgery with or without concomitant procedures in a UK population: a basis for a new risk model? , 2010, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). , 2010, European heart journal.

[12]  B. Billah,et al.  An Alternative Scoring System to Predict Risk for Surgical Site Infection Complicating Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2007, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[13]  A. Raz,et al.  Sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: validation of existing risk scores. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  A. Pappalardo,et al.  Protecting the crossover right internal thoracic artery bypass graft with a pedicled thymus flap. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  P. Agostoni Letter regarding article by Mauri et al, "Late loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparison". , 2005, Circulation.

[16]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Clinical Predictors of Major Infections After Cardiac Surgery , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  R. Koerfer,et al.  Clinical outcome of patients with deep sternal wound infection managed by vacuum-assisted closure compared to conventional therapy with open packing: a retrospective analysis. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  D. Spelman,et al.  A New Surgical-Site Infection Risk Index Using Risk Factors Identified by Multivariate Analysis for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2002, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[19]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[20]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[22]  S. Nashef,et al.  Eurp-pean system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro SCORE) , 1999 .

[23]  L. Hynan,et al.  Development of the Sternal Wound Infection Prediction Scale. , 1998, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[24]  R. Haley Measuring the intrinsic risk of wound infection in surgical patients , 1993 .

[25]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Multivariate Prediction of In‐Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 1992 .

[26]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[27]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.