Virtual Environment for Assessment of Neurocognitive Functioning: Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test

While standard neuropsychological measures have been found to have adequate predictive value, their ecological validity may diminish predictions about real world functioning. Virtual environments (VEs) are increasingly recognized as ecologically valid tools for neuropsychological assessment. We aim to develop a VE-based neuropsychological battery delivered within the context of a virtual city: Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test (VRCPAT). The 15 minute VRCPAT battery and 1.5 hour in-person neuropsychological assessment were conducted with a sample of 40 healthy adults, between the ages of 21 and 36, that included equivalent distributions of men and women from ethnically diverse populations. No subjects had history of psychiatric or neurologic conditions. Results supported both convergent and discriminant validity. The VRCPAT was found to correlate significantly with traditional neuropsychological tests assessing similar target constructs. No significant correlations existed between VRCPAT measures and non-target constructs. Findings suggest that the VRCPAT measures a capacity consistent with that of traditional neurocognitive measures; and is inconsistent with potential confounds. We conclude that the VRCPAT provides a unique opportunity to reliably and efficiently study neurocognitive function within an ecologically valid environment.

[1]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  Dorothy Strickland,et al.  The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  J. Galen Buckwalter,et al.  A Controlled Clinical Comparison of Attention Performance in Children with ADHD in a Virtual Reality Classroom Compared to Standard Neuropsychological Methods , 2007, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[4]  Todd Bowerly,et al.  A Virtual Reality Scenario for All Seasons: The Virtual Classroom , 2009, CNS Spectrums.

[5]  Albert Rizzo,et al.  Is Learning and Memory Different in a Virtual Environment? , 2007, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[6]  J. Galen Buckwalter,et al.  Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test , 2020 .

[8]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Gender Differences and Cognition Among Older Adults , 2005 .

[9]  R S Kennedy,et al.  Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Initial Validation of a Virtual Environment for Assessment of Memory Functioning: Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  James S. Elkind,et al.  A Simulated Reality Scenario Compared with the Computerized Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: An Analysis of Preliminary Results , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..