Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry

Purpose: Statistical shape modeling provides a powerful tool for describing and analyzing human anatomy. By linearly combining the variance of the shape of a population of a given anatomical entity, statistical shape models (SSMs) identify its main modes of variation and may approximate the total variance of that population to a selected threshold, while reducing its dimensionality. Even though SSMs have been used for over two decades, they lack in characterization of their goodness of prediction, in particular when defining whether these models are actually representative for a given population. Methods: The current paper presents, to the authors' knowledge, the most extent lower limb anatomy shape model considering the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneum to date. The present study includes the segmented training shapes (n = 542) obtained from 271 lower limb CT scans. The different models were evaluated in terms of accuracy, compactness, generalizability as well as specificity. Results: The size of training samples needed in each model so that it can be considered population covering was estimated to approximate around 200 samples, based on the generalizability properties of the different models. Simultaneously differences in gender and patterns in left-right asymmetry were identified and characterized. Size was found to be the most pronounced sexual discriminator whereas intra-individual variations in asymmetry were most pronounced at the insertion site of muscles. Conclusion: For models aimed at population covering descriptive studies, the number of training samples required should amount a sizeable 200 samples. The geometric morphometric method for sex discrimination scored excellent, however, it did not largely outperformed traditional methods based on discrete measures.

[1]  J. Argenson,et al.  Which factors influence proximal femoral asymmetry?: A 3D CT ANALYSIS OF 345 FEMORAL PAIRS , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  Dirk Vandermeulen,et al.  Cascaded statistical shape model based segmentation of the full lower limb in CT , 2019, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[3]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data , 2016, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[4]  C. Pattyn,et al.  Patient‐specific assessment of dysmorphism of the femoral head–neck junction: a statistical shape model approach , 2016, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[5]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Variant alleles of the Wnt antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Pelvic Bones from CT Data Based on a Statistical Shape Model , 2008, VCBM.

[7]  Tanuj Kanchan,et al.  A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[8]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[9]  R. Tague Do big females have big pelves? , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes , 2000 .

[11]  J. Bencke,et al.  Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Dysmorphometrics: the modelling of morphological abnormalities , 2012, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[15]  Sven Kreiborg,et al.  The BoneXpert Method for Automated Determination of Skeletal Maturity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Stéphane Lavallée,et al.  Nonrigid 3-D/2-D Registration of Images Using Statistical Models , 1999, MICCAI.

[18]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  G. Li,et al.  Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs. , 2016, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[20]  Tim Cootes,et al.  Investigation of Association Between Hip Osteoarthritis Susceptibility Loci and Radiographic Proximal Femur Shape , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[21]  Thor F Besier,et al.  Predictive statistical models of baseline variations in 3-D femoral cortex morphology. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  Tomasz Gos,et al.  The estimation of stature on the basis of measurements of the femur. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[23]  D. Turbón,et al.  Shape variability of the adult human acetabulum and acetabular fossa related to sex and age by geometric morphometrics. Implications for adult age estimation. , 2017, Forensic science international.

[24]  A. Pitsillides,et al.  Selective Activation of the MEK-ERK Pathway Is Regulated by Mechanical Stimuli in Forming Joints and Promotes Pericellular Matrix Formation* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[26]  J. Houwing-Duistermaat,et al.  Osteoarthritis susceptibility genes influence the association between hip morphology and osteoarthritis. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  Benedict Verhegghe,et al.  Fully automatic segmentation of femurs with medullary canal definition in high and in low resolution CT scans. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  Identification of mechanosensitive genes during skeletal development: alteration of genes associated with cytoskeletal rearrangement and cell signalling pathways , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[29]  M. Graw,et al.  Investigations on the reliability of determining an individual's age from the proximal femur. , 2002, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[30]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics , 2012, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  Jinke Wang,et al.  Automatic construction of statistical shape models using deformable simplex meshes with vector field convolution energy , 2017, Biomedical engineering online.

[32]  P. Claes,et al.  Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[33]  H. Kurki,et al.  Pelvic dimorphism in relation to body size and body size dimorphism in humans. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[34]  Sebastian T. Gollmer,et al.  A method for quantitative evaluation of statistical shape models using morphometry , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[35]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[36]  D. Turbón,et al.  A Collation of Recently Published Western European Formulae for Age Estimation of Subadult Skeletal Remains: Recommendations for Forensic Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology , 2013, Journal of Forensic Sciences.

[37]  P. Gunz,et al.  Geometric Morphometrics , 2019, Archaeological Science.